Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Outlaw Woman
you believe this is simply incompetence? Oh my.

Look forward to your explanation that would lead me to believe that it is more than incompetence. Educate me please.

I’m willing to listen and learn

21 posted on 10/08/2009 8:25:51 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: doc1019

I would first ask you, to explain why you believe it’s simply incompetence. Let’s start with you since you originally made the comment. I’m responding with my observations of the news and research. But I’m interested in your conclusion of simple incompetence.


26 posted on 10/08/2009 8:33:14 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (In Defense of Liberty.........Radicalism may be necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: doc1019
Look forward to your explanation that would lead me to believe that it is more than incompetence.

Allow me to intervene if you please. Incompetence implies 0 doesn't know what he is doing..... ie inexperience and naivete'. However, 0 knows exactly what he is doing and that is work towards destroying this country.

The law of averages would dictate that if 0 was acting out of complete incompetence, close to 50% of his actions/decisions would benefit this country in some face-value manner and be in the country's best interest.

In contrast to this, the demonstration of near 100% of his decisions being to undermine this country morally, financially, and militarily indicate he is not incompetent, but willfully pursuing a path to establish a socialist government.

50 posted on 10/08/2009 9:19:51 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: doc1019; Outlaw Woman
you believe this is simply incompetence? Oh my.

Look forward to your explanation that would lead me to believe that it is more than incompetence. Educate me please. I’m willing to listen and learn

Try reading the constitution. To start with firing a CEO of a private corporation is unconstitutional, an impeachable offense, a crime. Taking over a private enterprise, even without firing a CEO, is a crime because it is unconstitutional, an impeachable offense. He has committed others, the stimulus bill for instance, by signing this unconstitutional bill he has committed another impeachable offense, this time however the legislature is as guilty as he is.

Appointing Czars, even though other presidents have done so, is also unconstitutional as it by passes the legislature and by passes elected officials of any kind. All Presidents who have appointed Czars or Czar like positions have committed an impeachable offense.

To add to that, all he has to really do to be impeached, if we had a legislature that would do it, is to behave badly, which he has done from the git go, that is the definition of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors", bad behavior. Incompetence is actually, whether you believe it or not, another impeachable offense.

Feel free to feel educated and, as I pointed out at first, read the constitution and try to find where any of the crap he is pulling is constitutional.

BTW, passing a nationalized health care bill is unconstitutional, as is pushing it(as Bozo has done repeatedly) onto the American people and ignoring the will of the majority of the voting public. Impeachable offenses.

66 posted on 10/08/2009 10:57:39 PM PDT by calex59 (FUBO, we want our constitution back and we intend to get it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson