No serious definition would use "controlling" without specifying what is being controlled.
"without individual rights"
This is false: socialism is government's ownership of the means of production.
"(that is my definition)."
You are being a bit self-congratulatory here: your own definition has already become "common?"
It makes perfect sense: it is clear that among other elements
there must be a “controlling central government” to
enforce its social doctrine upon the people.