Elg’s father was a naturalized citizen and her mother was also a citizen by the current laws in America at the time Elg was born. She was born to two American citizen parents. This is another example of the liar that WOSG is trying to float yet another mischaracterization of a SCOTUS ruling. I don’t think WOSG can help the lying he tosses at Freerepublic, so don’t expect anything truthful from the poster.
There are at least three ways American citizenship can be defined: by naturalization of legal statute; by being born on American soil; native born; natural born, as a child born on American soil having American citizen parents at birth. That is the real value of the Elg case, that it discussed three ways citizenship can be established. If another country confers citizenship upon an American citizen, that is not the same category as citizen by blood or location of birth, but the professional liar—WOSG/obamanoids working FR—will try to conflate those to appear the same. They seek to establish on the one hand ten cite as rediculous the strawman that dual citizenship does not contradict natural born citizenship ... and these liars will use the notion of another nation conveying citizenship upon an American citizen—of course ignoring the two means by which American citizenship of by blood and/or by birth location, focusing speciously upon by statute—as their proof that dual citizenship does not cancel natural born status. The very case the liar, WOSG, cited—Perkins v Elg—is a perfect example of a natural born citizen—Miss Elg—holding dual citizenship by natural born status AND by statute from Norway yet not losing her natural born status because she never utilized the Norwegian citizenship conveyed upon her by statute. Deception and dissembling are the game of posters like WOSG. It is lying by another name, when they seek to deceive readers as WOSG has tried to do.