Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Thanks, that answers a lot.

If, say, Iran hit them with a nuclear device and they are crippled but hurl a country-destroying salvo back at Iran and beat back attacks from Lebanon and Gaza do they still have deterrent against advancing armies from Syria and Egypt in a scenario that lasts for days or weeks?

6 posted on 10/07/2009 1:53:18 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: MARTIAL MONK

It wouldn’t take 400 nuclear weapons to destroy the bulk of Iran. There would still be enough left over to take on other enemies, I would think. Building an atom bomb is one thing, delivering it is another. It will probably be awhile before Iran is able to fit a nuclear warhead on to a missile unless someone is helping them (the Russians? AQ Khan?)
By now, the Israelis might have thermonuclear weapons (”H-bombs”) which is a whole different ballgame. The trigger for an H-bomb is an A-bomb, IIRC.


7 posted on 10/07/2009 2:06:52 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MARTIAL MONK

That’s where God comes in.


11 posted on 10/07/2009 5:17:46 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MARTIAL MONK

If Iran hits them with a nuke, no one is going to invade. It’s like signing your own death warrant. Israel is not that big. Ironically, the West Bank and Jordan would be looking at serious radiation problems.


12 posted on 10/07/2009 5:21:46 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson