[Tidbit]

There is something quite perverse about a society that allows avowed and unrepentant homosexuals to unnaturally take on children as playthings.

But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children. I'm not even sure I'd want adoption restricted in that manner. In this brave new world of Obama-ism, I'd be afraid that people not unlike many of us who post here would be told they're neither permitted to procreate or to adopt. ::shudder::

[cartervt2k]

But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children. I'm not even sure I'd want adoption restricted in that manner. In this brave new world of Obama-ism, I'd be afraid that people not unlike many of us who post here would be told they're neither permitted to procreate or to adopt. ::shudder::

I'm with you. Would anybody be surprised if the next generation of liberals tried to slap restrictions on hetero couples, claiming some wacky discrimination because a 3rd party is necesary for them to reproduce? Does the idea of reproductive limits with government mandated abortions seem that crazy anymore (remember: more babies = more CO2)? I'm sure there's a way to deconstruct the Constitution for them to justify it with a straight face.

[itsahoot]

But I'm not sure I'd want to live in a society that restricted pregnancy to only those it deemed worthy of having children

On the road to diversion again I see.