Yes, but that only works if you can force him off his property. That is where the analogy breaks down. Actually, it strengthens the analogy.
How's Tibet these days?
Do you really think that same China is afraid of upsetting the Kenyan crypto-homo in the White House, or his bought and paid for Feinsteins, Schumers, and Boxers?
We're about to be evicted from the lands our forefathers died to preserve, and it's at the hand of quisling traitors like the aforementioned reptiles who got 30 pieces of silver from China etc.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
The reason I said my analogy breaks down is that with a homeowner the government actually has authority over him. He is morally obliged to bend to the government’s will. With countries, if China wants part of the US, there will be a fight. They would not attempt it because it would bloody both sides, and their net result would be more negative than the status quo.
Little countries don’t have a chance. They may have a right to fight, but so did Belgium against Nazi Germany.
I think we basically agree, based on what I am reading.