Replies

Of course, I disagree with the age assigned to “Arti”, but other than that, the article makes some excellent points on how this overturns the prevailing Temple of Darwin “wisdom” with respect to human evolution.

All the best—GGG

Even one so thick as moi can see that Ardi though perhaps Ardent and willing to walk for sex (a lame reasoning) didn't have feet made for walking. Nor knuckles either despite the NBA length fingers and arms.
The question I have is why a perfectly good tree dwelling, sex finding, occasional hind leg walking animal would give up all that just to become an old bag of bones.
Supposedly we'll see Sunday as Ardi strides across the tube with the ease and pace of a politician headed for higher office.

“Of course, I disagree with the age assigned to “Ardi”, but other than that, the article makes some excellent points on how this overturns the prevailing Temple of Darwin “wisdom” with respect to human evolution.” GGG

Oh, quite so. Gazing over the Savanna Grass is looking for love in all the wrong places for Ardi and Friends, As she says it's a tree for me and thee and hopefully three. Now it's small teeth, home and honey instead of just hooking up for a while. No more red in tooth and claw or something like that.

After all the investment of Nat. Geo. in Madison Ave. yesterdays stale decafe Evoulutionary brew better be overturned, and now The Temple of Darwin can say,
“God created Adam from the dust, Well..we created Ardi from the dust, it just took us a little longer”.

We're not to pay any attention to the nay sayers who are really looking at the bones behind the curtains of hype. thanks for the heads up!