Skip to comments.
Do Not Blame Barack
American Thinker ^
| October 04, 2009
| Selwyn Duke
Posted on 10/03/2009 10:49:37 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: neverdem
I’m not young or rich, but I’d give up social security. Even at this late date, I’d rather have my future contributions to invest as I see fit, to own them completely and be able to give them to my children as inheritance.
However, the author is right. We’ve been on this road a long, long time. Americans sacrificed their freedom for security a long time ago, and soon, I suspect, we’ll have neither.
To: srmorton
"... my husband always tells me to avoid three topics of conversation - politics, religion, and sports ..."
What else is there? :)
And your efforts are helping both mother and child; imagine the joy on the face of Christ.
62
posted on
10/04/2009 6:50:03 AM PDT
by
mlizzy
("It is impossible to walk rapidly and be unhappy" --Mother Teresa of Calcutta.)
To: neverdem
That was an excellent article. Thanks for posting it.
63
posted on
10/04/2009 6:51:11 AM PDT
by
bogusname
(Banish All Lliberals)
To: Berlin_Freeper
![](http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m165/t17o76m/hitler001.png)
![](http://orangecow.org/pythonet/pics/gumby2.jpg)
" I think he's got beautiful legs!"
64
posted on
10/04/2009 6:52:22 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: marron
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
To: NTHockey
I would gladly give up Social Security AND Medicare. Just return the money stolen from my paychecks over the last 40 years. Do that and were square. That would be nice, but the money is long gone. At this point, I would be happy if the government were simply to stop stealing any more from my paychecks.
To: Logophile; NTHockey
At this point, I would be happy if the government were simply to stop stealing any more from my paychecks. yes... i too would be willing to cut my losses...
67
posted on
10/04/2009 7:51:09 AM PDT
by
latina4dubya
( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
To: neverdem; All
We also have to ask how serious most Americans really are about respecting the Constitution. Here's a little test for them: Are you willing to give up your Social Security in the name of constitutional adherence?
Yes! Yes! A thousand times yes! Simply allow me to stop subsidizing other's retirement NOW, and you can keep the thousands and thousands of dollars I have already contributed but will probably never see. Allow me to plan for my own retirement, with a low-level security blanket in place for the truly needy and unfortunate in our society, and not those who would simply gorge from the public trough, and I will happily go on my way...but alas, I fear too many Americans have already been converted to the 'government as benefactor' meme
68
posted on
10/04/2009 8:03:40 AM PDT
by
notdownwidems
(Vote Republican! We're 1/10 of 1% better than the other guys!)
To: neverdem
"Yet, to be blunt, Obama doesn't alarm me as much as the average American...."
President Obama is a symptom....the electorate is the root cause...
That this man was elected the leader of the free-world is something the scares the living you know what out of me....
69
posted on
10/04/2009 8:13:29 AM PDT
by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
To: wastoute
"Givning up" Social Security isn't a choice. There is no money. "Giving up" Medicare won't be a choice either. You are right. We hear people talk about "saving" Social Security or Medicare, but there is nothing to save. The money has been spent. The trust funds are no more real than the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.
I have been posting for months that it reallyh doesn't matter if they "pass" a bill for Health Care they can't pay for it. We are at the point where we have no choice but to go back to the Constitution.
Alas, there is another choice: Turn to a Strong Man who promises to make everything right. I hope that Americans value their freedom too much to go down that road.
To: Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ASA Vet; NormsRevenge; 2111USMC; george76
What we’ve known all along......ping
71
posted on
10/04/2009 9:14:13 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: STARWISE
Your post on the eight we lost yesterday was bitingly true....
Ping to article.
72
posted on
10/04/2009 9:22:20 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: neverdem
“I believe, practically speaking, he is an evil man”
When the story comes out how the left conspired to crash the financial markets to get the Kenyan elected, the American people won’t think he’s so great.
73
posted on
10/04/2009 9:28:32 AM PDT
by
y6162
(uish..)
To: y6162
I hope you're right, but the sycophantic state-run media will make sure that story remains buried. For them it is always "Bush's fault!"
74
posted on
10/04/2009 10:14:46 AM PDT
by
Zman516
(socialists & muslims -- satan's useful idiots.)
To: nathanbedford
Soulless zombies, LOL! They're quite animated for being soulless zombies.
The scary part of all this is that we are immersed in a war of survival against mindless, fundamentalist Islam while a political party which represents nearly half the electorate is dysfunctional.
It would be nice if the GOP could do more than leave things to Divine Providence and praise the Lord. The GOP needs to do more than just wait for the independents and moderates to become disenchanted with the left.
75
posted on
10/04/2009 10:19:34 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
The description, "soulless zombies" you understand was written some time ago and was intended not to describe a want of ambition or animation on the part of the left but to describe a
moral condition.
I agree with your analysis of the Republicans of their responsibilities to the country to stop the democrats ruining the country. I have some hope that they are at last finding their soul. It might be that they just have nothing more to lose.
76
posted on
10/04/2009 10:41:37 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: mlizzy
77
posted on
10/04/2009 10:51:51 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
To: AlexW
And as true as white on rice :) He called a spade a spade.
:-)
79
posted on
10/04/2009 11:52:00 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: nathanbedford
Because they represent the leading edge of a psychic nihilism in which facts and values are deadweights be abandoned on the trail toward today's new thing. Do you see the corresponding response in the Right commentators and pundits that I see?
I think the current fascination with Libertarianism manifesting itself in some Talk Radio and Right of center bloggers is response to this. Trapped in a similar physic cage, they have fixed on a political nihilism.
The philopshy manifested by these hosts and bloggers seems to be "the only good government is no Government"
80
posted on
10/04/2009 12:57:43 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson