Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paudio
If they were not married, it’s more likely that he had to follow the mother’s. Am I wrong?

I would think that the father's name on the long form birth certificate would establish parentage, married or not. The Certificate of Live Birth form, in '61, did not even contain a field to indicate if the parents were married. It also asks for the mother's maiden name, not her married name, if any.

Thus, if the test for NBC is having two US citizen parents, he fails, IF the long Form BC shows BHO Sr as his father.

IMHO, the search for British citizenship for Junior is misplaced. It doesn't matter. Citizenship of his father, the legal one, does. If the father was not a US Citizen, the child is not an NBC. Now there are potential circumstances that would make BHO Jr. not even a citizen, unless later naturalized, but confirming those could prove difficult.

48 posted on 10/03/2009 8:35:44 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

Father’s citizenship was crucial to the founding fathers. Otherwise why did Chester A Arthur spend so much effort covering up his father’s foreign birth?

Is in not interesting that father’s provenance had more weight than mother’s. Women did not have the vote either...And it should have stayed that way (LOL)


57 posted on 10/03/2009 10:56:31 AM PDT by dennisw (Free Republic is an island in a sea of zombies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson