Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/02/2009 5:59:52 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: alrea; bareford101; BerniesFriend; blaveda; Bookwoman; Celeste732; dsc; Faux_Pas; fortunecookie; ...

2 posted on 10/02/2009 6:00:41 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kennedy will be the swing vote to knock out all these gun bans, 5-4, turn the oven off the pie is done, and won’t it taste good.


3 posted on 10/02/2009 6:03:26 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Methinks we should put subtle-but-strong security around five Justices... and hope Kennedy comes down upright on this.


5 posted on 10/02/2009 6:10:41 PM PDT by JohnQ1 (Pray for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
On a side note, did ya catch what Scalia recently said....

Scalia: ‘We Are Devoting Too Many of Our Best Minds to’ Lawyering

Well, you know, two chiefs ago, Chief Justice Burger, used to complain about the low quality of counsel. I used to have just the opposite reaction. I used to be disappointed that so many of the best minds in the country were being devoted to this enterprise.

I mean there’d be a, you know, a defense or public defender from Podunk, you know, and this woman is really brilliant, you know. Why isn’t she out inventing the automobile or, you know, doing something productive for this society?

I mean lawyers, after all, don’t produce anything. They enable other people to produce and to go on with their lives efficiently and in an atmosphere of freedom. That’s important, but it doesn’t put food on the table and there have to be other people who are doing that. And I worry that we are devoting too many of our very best minds to this enterprise.

And they appear here in the Court, I mean, even the ones who will only argue here once and will never come again. I’m usually impressed with how good they are. Sometimes you get one who’s not so good. But, no, by and large I don’t have any complaint about the quality of counsel, except maybe we’re wasting some of our best minds.

6 posted on 10/02/2009 6:10:57 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“in the home”...disastrous.


7 posted on 10/02/2009 6:13:20 PM PDT by SandWMan ( I'm still trying to find the section in the Constitution that mentions "nation building".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
the Revolution was fought and independence won so that the Founding Fathers could write a U.S. Constitution with a Bill of Rights that applied only to the District of Columbia.

If this reasoning is upheld it will start a war.

8 posted on 10/02/2009 6:26:23 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I sure hope and pray they get rid of these gun bans. I live in the People’s Republic of MA and it’s always puckering time to renew my LTC. I am one of the fortunate ones that has an LTC-A no restrictions living in Boston, but it’s BS the hoops they make folks go through to get one.


10 posted on 10/02/2009 6:41:36 PM PDT by IAintGotNoMoney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It is the right of all Americans to be able to defend themselves and their families, to "keep and bear arms."

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

11 posted on 10/02/2009 7:11:59 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Gun that Ban DOWN! Put our 2nd Amendment FIRST!!


12 posted on 10/02/2009 7:18:44 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

and thanks FGS:

Montana Gun Suit Challenges Federal Authority
cbsnews.com | 1 October, 2009 | Declan McCullagh
Posted on 10/02/2009 5:08:05 AM PDT by marktwain
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2353259/posts


15 posted on 10/02/2009 8:18:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

ping


16 posted on 10/02/2009 10:14:11 PM PDT by ponygirl ("I can see the Olympic Stadium from my house!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

On a RELATED point: I am sure Rio deserved to win the Olympic slot, yet I am also convinced that much of the “No” vote on Chicago was pure anti-Americanism.

HOWEVER, with Chicago’s handgun ban, no shooting athlete would have been ALLOWED to compete, or even posess his handgun, in Chi-town! Maybe they would have done that in Michigan? Perhaps THAT is one reason why they voted for Rio.


18 posted on 10/03/2009 5:38:50 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“But it left unclear whether the ruling applied outside the nation’s capital.”
When the civil rights act was passed did every civil rights group in other states need to use the courts to overturn racist laws?


19 posted on 10/03/2009 8:51:32 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson