Of course they won’t read it. Way too many big words and lawyer speak. They haven’t got a clue what all that crap means. Why bother reading it.
Also he shouldn’t bother voting on the bill either
They’ll have to break out the dictionary. Big words are just to hard to digest. Can you say ‘transparency’?
He will not read the bill-bill but he will read the Cliff Notes. Unfortunately, the Cliff Notes are not really the bill so there will be many nasty surprises hidden in the actual language not revealed in a sanitized summary. Even if he read the actural bill, it would not matter. A large part of the details will be determined by the courts.
I applaud this rat on his honesty. I do not oppose this bill based on his honesty. I oppose the bill on principle. I oppose price controls, health care rights, government rationing schemes, and wealth redistribution policies. If we are to have this nonsense, I would prefer a straightforward bill providing a Canadian style plan. This bill is a horrible mess of demands from many competing interest groups. It is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever concocted, saying a lot because of many horrible pieces of legislation.
This is an absolute outrage.
None of the variants of these bills go into effect until 2013. They should be published on the ‘net and left there for review for several months.
The question I hope people will keep asking is why congress is not subjecting themselves and their labor union thug buddies to these plans.
Keep reminding people over and over and over of that fact and that ostammer doesn’t want the bill going into effect until after the 2012 election.
These are two huge points that have been mentioned, but not nearly enough. Keep repeating them.