Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Texas Ban On Gay Marriage Unconstitutional (To the old USA, it was nice knowing you)
msnbc ^ | 10/1/2009 | Stacy Morrow

Posted on 10/01/2009 5:41:27 PM PDT by tobyhill

A Dallas judge ruled Thursday that Texas' ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional as she cleared the way for two gay men to divorce, the Dallas Morning News reported.

State District Judge Tena Callahan said the state’s bans on same-sex marriage violates the constitutional guarantee to equal protection under the law.

While the Texas attorney general had stepped in the case to say that since a gay marriage isn’t recognized in Texas then a Texas court can’t dissolve one through divorce, Tena denied the intervention.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: gayagenda; gaystapo; homobama; homosexualagenda; perverts; tenacallahan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2009 5:41:28 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

They just don’t get it and probably never will.


2 posted on 10/01/2009 5:45:13 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts (“Cap and Trade bill tells us how to live.. Health Care bill tells us how to die.” Bauer and Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The dumb b*tch needs to be impeached or recalled and tossed out of Texas.


3 posted on 10/01/2009 5:45:38 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

This is the thing that always got me about this supposed Civil right to marry. It is called D-i-v-o-r-c-e. Civil marrigage is basically a contract. Why not just go to a lawyer and have one drawn up. NOOOOO this was and is about tearing at the fabric of the traditional family.


4 posted on 10/01/2009 5:45:45 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Where in the Constitution??? Can someone tell me where?


5 posted on 10/01/2009 5:46:18 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I would propose the unhappy couple move to Mass. or California...

Take a long romantic train ride, see if they can rekindle the spark that led them to civil union bliss...

And if it doesn’t work out for them, well, the move will handle two things...

Get them the hell out of Texas, and two, give them the opportunity to go to a state(s) to take care of their “legal” problems...


6 posted on 10/01/2009 5:47:21 PM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Ping!


7 posted on 10/01/2009 5:48:37 PM PDT by GWMcClintock ("When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Ps.11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
This is all a part of the gay agenda forcing themselves on other states even with laws prohibiting the gay marriage. If the judge recognizes the divorce then they are forcing recognition of the so-called marriage.
8 posted on 10/01/2009 5:49:38 PM PDT by tobyhill (The Communist has arrived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

another illiterate judge. Equal protection? They have equal protection - each person can marry one single person of the opposite sex, assuming that person consents. That’s equal for everyone. Done - nothing more equal than that.

This activist should take their illegal rulings and move to a marxist leaning state and leave Texas alone.


9 posted on 10/01/2009 5:49:57 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Her website shows her schmoozing with Chris Bell, Democratic candidate for
Texas governor. That explains the lack of moral conscience.


10 posted on 10/01/2009 5:54:25 PM PDT by antidemoncrat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

It turns out she’s up for re-election in 2010 and is already seeking funds for her campaign. Here’s her website; spread the word to support her opponent.

http://www.judgecallahan.com/


11 posted on 10/01/2009 5:55:40 PM PDT by Engineer_Soldier (Rubio for Senate! Charlie Crist is another John McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

They used the backdoor to over turn the ban by attempting to get a divorce.

And while this will be overturned, at some point there will be a case that goes to the SCOTUS and gay marriage will win n an EPC claim.

They have the votes, Stevens, Bryer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kennedy.


12 posted on 10/01/2009 5:57:26 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I thought I voted for a constitutional amendment to define marraige. I guess that was unconstitutional? What a joke!


13 posted on 10/01/2009 5:59:47 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Is this TEXAS we’re talking about????

The people have spoken! Judges can’t overturn what the people have approved!


14 posted on 10/01/2009 6:00:06 PM PDT by wk4bush2004 (PALIN-BACHMANN, 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engineer_Soldier
It turns out she’s up for re-election in 2010

Good find! Spread the word, Texas Freepers.


15 posted on 10/01/2009 6:01:16 PM PDT by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

You know what to do Dallas. Send this judge packing.


16 posted on 10/01/2009 6:08:23 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus
Equal protection? They have equal protection - each person can marry one single person of the opposite sex, assuming that person consents.

If that were a valid argument, interracial marriage bans would not have been struck down by the SCOTUS.

17 posted on 10/01/2009 6:09:16 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

So how do you remove a judge who does not respect your state constitution?


18 posted on 10/01/2009 6:10:09 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Some states will allow a recall of judges, I don’t know if Texas does.


19 posted on 10/01/2009 6:12:56 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

>State District Judge Tena Callahan said the state’s bans on same-sex marriage violates the constitutional guarantee to equal protection under the law.

That only is possible if you accept a gender-neutral definition of marriage, which most of us don’t... as evidenced by even CALIFORNIA’S prop. 9 passage.


20 posted on 10/01/2009 6:15:03 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson