Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Different' Afghan strategy urged
BBC News ^ | 10/1/09 | BBC

Posted on 10/01/2009 9:11:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Coalition forces in Afghanistan are going to have to adopt a "dramatically different" strategy to ensure success, the top US general there says.

In his first speech since submitting a report calling for more troops, Gen Stanley McChrystal also said the operation had been "under-resourced".

The success of the military operation could not be taken for granted in the face of a growing insurgency, he said.

Meanwhile, a Nato strike in Helmand has killed at least six civilians.

Women and children are believed to be among the dead. Nato has said it will investigate the incident.

It said it had dropped a bomb on a compound in the southern province of Helmand from where insurgents were exchanging fire with security forces.

The protection of civilians is one of the cornerstones of Gen McChrystal's Afghan strategy.

But the White House has said that a review of its Afghan plans may take many weeks.

"We have under-resourced our operations, in some areas we have under-performed, in some areas we have under-co-ordinated and in some ways we have not overcome very intrinsic disadvantages," Gen McChrystal told the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghan; different; mcchrystal; strategy; urged; wot

1 posted on 10/01/2009 9:11:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Pakistan = Cambodia/Laos

How North Vietnam Won The War
Bui Tin Interviewed by Stephen Young

The Wall Street Journal, 3 August 1995

http://www.viet-myths.net/buitin.htm

Bui Tin served on the general staff of North Vietnam’s army and personally received the surrender of South Vietnam on April 30, 1975 in Saigon. He became editor of the People’s Daily, the official newspaper of Vietnam.

Q: Was the American antiwar movement important to Hanoi’s
victory?

A: It was essential to our strategy... Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American antiwar movement. Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda, and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses. We were elated when Jane Fonda, wearing a red Vietnamese dress, said at a press conference that she was ashamed of American actions in the war and that she would struggle along with us.

Q: Did the Politburo pay attention to these visits?

A: Keenly.

Q: Why?

A: Those people represented the conscience of America. The conscience of America was part of its war-making capability, and we were turning that power in our favor. America lost because of its democracy; through dissent and protest it lost the ability to mobilize a will to win.

Q: How could the Americans have won the war?

A: Cut the Ho Chi Minh trail inside Laos. If Johnson had granted [Gen. William] Westmoreland’s requests to enter Laos and block the Ho Chi Minh trail, Hanoi could not have won the war.

Q: What else?

A: We had the impression that American commanders had their hands tied by political factors. Your generals could never deploy a maximum force for greatest military effect.


2 posted on 10/01/2009 9:14:25 AM PDT by angkor (The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Has anyone, any place, ever seen a war where civilians haven’t been killed? If we are serious about this war, civilians will be involved. Unless we have become totally stupid about war.


3 posted on 10/01/2009 9:16:27 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Link to audio of speech and Q&A session after the General’s speech is available at the IISS web site.

http://www.iiss.org/

http://www.iiss.org/recent-key-addresses/general-stanley-mcchrystal-address/


4 posted on 10/01/2009 9:22:42 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

We simply beat ourselves by respecting the non existing sanctity of the Durand Line and the “sovereignity” of the Pakistani BadLands.


5 posted on 10/01/2009 11:03:32 AM PDT by swarthyguy (MEAT, the new tobacco. Your right to eat meat ends where my planetary ecosystem begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

” We must protect the Afghan people from all threats - from the enemy,
from our own actions,” he said.

Gen McChrystal stressed the importance of the Afghan population’s support when tackling the insurgency.

“We don’t win by destroying the Taliban,
by body count,
by the number of successful of military raids.
We win when the people decide we win,” he said.”


6 posted on 10/01/2009 11:03:39 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson