I know creationists and IDers don't like peer review because it exposes the non-scientific nature or poor quality of their publications that relate to creationism and ID. That's why their requirements for peer review were very lax when they decided to start their own "scientific" journal (failed journal, BTW).
I have noticed a certain behavior shared by creationists, IDers and the Jesse Jackson crowd. When things don't go your way in the real world, when your can't hack it on your meager talents, just pull out the race/ID card and scream "I'm being persecuted!" Poor babies, can't hack it in the cutthroat world of science.
Uhhhh, that’s not what we have a problem with...the problem is the outright fraud...
it should be re-labeled “evo-review”, because obviously anyone that doesn’t agree is 100% of the time shouted down with “religious attacks on science” nonsense liberal cult talking points...
you can’t parrot your way out of the facts...but that’s simply not science.
You wouldn’t know science or peer review is if fell on you!
LOL...I guess everyone’s supposed to just ignore it’s you ninnies that require the courts to prop you up?
OK...
Kind of like Michael Newdow...”But I don’t WANT to be reminded of God...waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh...”
And we’re supposed to ignore that algore says “the debate is over”...along with your liberal fellow great ape Chrissy Fit Matthews demanding his apehood is “settled science”?
OK...
no wonder you clowns have insulated yourselves from reality in this alternative universe you’ve created for yourselves, the world is crashing down all around you!
LOL!