“So much for Dobzhansky’s dictum that “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”!”
—Why? I don’t see anything in the article actually attacking or disagreeing with Darwinism, let alone evolution.
It appears to be an article attacking reductionism and dogma. Other than being a bit melodramatic and pretentious, I don’t have an issue with anything in the article. Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not sure what you see as so significant in the article.
Well...I for one am just stunned at your conclusions.
So now you too agree that “Neo-Darwinism cannot deliver answers, because its vision of biology is fundamentally flawed”?