If that is true then why is Gary Kreep referencing Hollister v. McCain, a New Hampshire district court case, as justification for his claim that Keyes has standing because he was a presidential candidate?
I did not say Obama couldn't use the Rhodes USDC decision in his argument. I just said it wasn't binding on Carter. The same goes Keyes' pleadings. He can use the same arguments, but they aren't binding either. Judge Carter can give them whatever weight he chooses or can choose to ignore them.