Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whoopi Defends Polanski: ‘It wasn’t rape-rape.’
Big Hollywood ^ | 9/28/09

Posted on 09/29/2009 5:24:39 AM PDT by DogBarkTree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-263 next last
To: DogBarkTree

Whoopie, you ignorant slut.


221 posted on 09/29/2009 7:13:31 PM PDT by Merlinator (Take them all down...one czar at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Question: Does anyone know the sponsors of The View. A few people would probably like words with them about this. Has anyone done that research already?


222 posted on 09/29/2009 8:08:46 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Sounds like President Clinton talking about Lewinsky

Sounds like obambi talking about Donald Young


223 posted on 09/29/2009 8:31:25 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Of course that is correct but my point was that people think this was a love affair or something.

What ever he may have claimed it to be, a 40 year old man with an 13 year old girl is rape! No questions, not excuses. This is not the 20 year old with the 17 year old girl we often hear about.

I don't really give a damn about the circumstances when a man old enough to be her father messes with a minor. As adults, we have an obligation to protect children, not to abuse them.

And if she were my daughter, the SOB would have begged them to put him in high security at least until I was dead because I would have enforced a different law than the state does.

224 posted on 09/29/2009 8:34:09 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

If this were Fr. Polanski, Catholic priest, instead of Roman Polanski, Hollywood (Leftist) film direct, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation.


225 posted on 09/29/2009 8:53:55 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

T Mobile has her as a sponsor. Miss Whoopi Rape Rape.


226 posted on 09/29/2009 9:03:42 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

I think what she was TRYING to say was that it wasn’t forcible rape. She wants to make it look like statutory rape. IMHO, a 19 year old boyfriend having sex with his minor girlfriend is statutory rape. A 45 yr old have sex with a 13 yr old girl is rape-rape whether it was a forcible rape or not.


227 posted on 09/29/2009 9:04:48 PM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot

Aside from the rape, if some 35 year old guy gave my thirteen year old daughter drugs of any sort, I would personally hunt him down in France

XACTLY!!!

But this little girl didn’t have parents with guts enough to do that. Not even an Uncle or Cousin. ...but then that is what Liberals are - COWARDS.


228 posted on 09/29/2009 9:22:30 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

If it were Whoopi who was ‘not rape-raped,’ I’m guessing it would be the most heinous WHATEVER that ever was committed.


229 posted on 09/29/2009 9:39:50 PM PDT by gz3 (whoopi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

Boy, are you right about that.


230 posted on 09/29/2009 10:19:56 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

Folks, it wasn’t “rape-rape”, it was rape-rape-rape. That musta been what Whoopi Iceberg meant. Gotta be?


231 posted on 09/29/2009 10:43:26 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

...just like her explanation is really stupid, but not stupid....


232 posted on 09/29/2009 11:05:56 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

There was some famous comedian—it might have been Rick Ducommun—who said, “Hmm. Reagan had colon cancer. He had cancer on his nose. It’s because he had his head up his ass!” And, there were DUers who, upon Reagan’s death, said, “I’m sorry he died. I wish he had suffered Alzheimer’s and a return of his colon cancer for a few years.” Your post reminded me of this since some liberal commentator was wishing that Kazan sat in soiled underwear for hours while waiting to die. Nice people.

I’m sure a DUer reading this would say, “What about your Ted Kennedy threads?” They weren’t filled with well-wishes, true, but the few who went over the line saw their comments deleted.


233 posted on 09/29/2009 11:13:21 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

The DU’ers know they are done. Their life ends at 30 and then they beg the government for help. It’s kinda obvious.


234 posted on 09/29/2009 11:20:45 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: DB

many women and a lot of men don’t even believe rape is a crime....just “natural”..


235 posted on 09/30/2009 12:04:45 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Maybe Whoopi meant Rape-A-Dope?
Oh man,
Those hybrid Lesbians are impossible to figure out.
236 posted on 09/30/2009 12:07:32 AM PDT by MaxMax (Um, Ah, hmm, um, er, ah, achoo, er, um, sneeze, er, BUSH'S FAULT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

““...if Polanski had been a conservative film maker!”

Surprisingly, the NYT today said that putting Polanski in jail was exactly the right thing to do. I guess there are limits on what even liberals will tolerate.


237 posted on 09/30/2009 1:34:56 AM PDT by freethinker_for_freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
I think what she was TRYING to say was that it wasn’t forcible rape.

California law lists duress in the same sentence as violence when describing rape:

(2) Where it is accomplished against a person's will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another.

Not to mention drugging the victim:

(3) Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the accused.

The bottom line is that Whoopi is an idiot, but we knew that already.

238 posted on 09/30/2009 2:46:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

I guess Whoopi doesn’t consider it rape when it happens to 13 year old white girls.


239 posted on 09/30/2009 3:26:16 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azkathy
I agree 100%.

As if promoting those who cheat on their income tax was not bad enough, now President Barack Obama surrounds himself with pervs such as Kevin Jennings.

240 posted on 09/30/2009 5:08:44 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson