[tarheelswamprat]

I didn’t ‘hear’, I READ on The Drudge Report that some walked out on her speech.

Then you should learn to say what you mean - you said you heard it.

I did read some of her speech but not 90 minutes worth.

Then you affirm my point. Your comments are merely hearsay-based but perfectly acceptable subjective speculations for general discussion, nothing more. They don't add anything substantive to the discussion of the issue of whether the speech was good or not.

[potlatch]

I’m going to bed, you can find somebody else to pick on.

BUT - that’s just ‘hearsay’ as I may not really be going to bed!

[potlatch]

[Your comments are merely hearsay-based ]

Sarah Palin made her international debut today in a closed-door speech at the CLSA Investors’ Forum in Hong Kong. AFP reports that Palin’s speech, which touched on issues like international terrorism and the U.S. debt, “divided” the audience and even prompted a few delegates to leave in disgust:

Think Progress » Delegates walk out of Palin’s first international ...

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/23/delegates-leave-palin/

Delegates walk out ‘in disgust’ at Palin speech

Questions are prearranged; ‘It was awful,’ one US delegate says

http://rawstory.com/2009/09/guests-walk-out-in-disgust-at-palin-speech/

Palin slams Obama’s spending in debut speech in Asia

Some of those who attended praised her forthright views on government social and economic intervention and others walked out early in disgust.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090923/pl_afp/hongkonguspoliticseconomypalin_20090923092712

That's enough ‘hearsay’ for tonight.
This is in reply to your comments.
I am a supporter and admirer of Sarah Palin