[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

The assumptions I am talking about aren’t hypothesis. I am talking about an uniformitarian presumption in radiometric dating. And no creation scientists don’t twist anything. However when evolutionist find data that doesn’t fit within their worldview it gets buried or twisted or explained away.
No one is claiming to know all the answers. The Bible isn’t a science textbook but where it does touch on scientific topics I would rather trust the Word and Witness of the One who was there over the ideas and presumptions of fallible man. Have a good evening.

[allmendream]

Creationism isn't science. There is no such thing as a “creation scientist” in the same way there are “physics scientists”. All a creation “scientist” can do is twist the data to fit his YEC model, and that is not now and never will be science.

You trust only your own word, and against a mountain of evidence; but the key to being a creationist is to NOT test your assumptions of infallibility of scriptural interpretation against reality.