To: SandyInSeattle
A couple years ago, Michelle Malkin had linked an “undercover” picture expose of this revolting “Leather Fair”. The pictures were absolutely vile and people had brought children to this X-rated affair. Those pictures weren’t for the faint of heart and I don’t see why performing the acts that were pictured, were allowed to take place, at all. I’m sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws? (one would hope)
7 posted on
09/27/2009 9:04:41 PM PDT by
machogirl
To: machogirl
Im sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws? (one would hope) I'd like to think so, but apparently morals are optional if not discouraged in San Francisco.
9 posted on
09/27/2009 9:09:14 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Socialism is the plundering of the productive by the unaccountable)
To: machogirl
Im sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws?The county jail is full.
16 posted on
09/27/2009 9:27:46 PM PDT by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: machogirl
Im sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws?Yes, they do, but not as we would typically think of them. They consider openly possessing the following to be indecent public displays:
24 posted on
09/27/2009 11:53:19 PM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(If God didn't want a One Worlder hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created rope)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson