Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandyInSeattle

A couple years ago, Michelle Malkin had linked an “undercover” picture expose of this revolting “Leather Fair”. The pictures were absolutely vile and people had brought children to this X-rated affair. Those pictures weren’t for the faint of heart and I don’t see why performing the acts that were pictured, were allowed to take place, at all. I’m sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws? (one would hope)


7 posted on 09/27/2009 9:04:41 PM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: machogirl
I’m sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws? (one would hope)

I'd like to think so, but apparently morals are optional if not discouraged in San Francisco.

9 posted on 09/27/2009 9:09:14 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Socialism is the plundering of the productive by the unaccountable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: machogirl
I’m sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws?

The county jail is full.

16 posted on 09/27/2009 9:27:46 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: machogirl
I’m sure that San Fransisco has to have some public indecency laws?

Yes, they do, but not as we would typically think of them. They consider openly possessing the following to be indecent public displays:


24 posted on 09/27/2009 11:53:19 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a One Worlder hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created rope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson