[benjibrowder]

For what?

Defamation? Its only defamation if they were lies. Videos don’t lie. Doubt it meets entrapment, and wouldn’t it meet some whistleblower laws? Also, the videos they’re asking a judge to prevent being viewed, those can only be videos that were made in their jurisdiction correct? Despite the fact that ACORN was not legally allowed to operate in Maryland in the first place?

[BuckeyeTexan]

For intentionally, willfully, in reckless disregard of the law, and with malice, intercepting, disclosing, and posting on the Internet private communications with Balitmore ACORN employees without their knowledge or consent in violation of (Baltimore) Courts and Judicial Proceedings Codes 10-402(a) and 10-410 resulting in the loss of employment, extreme emotional distress, and damage of the reputations of the two Baltimore ACORN employees and damage to the reputation of ACORN ... allegedly.

[American Constitutionalist]

That's good for Andrew , James, and Hannah, so what if they make a injunction to not show the videos of the videos made in Maryland, does not stop Andrew from showing what else he has up his sleave to the nation from other states....