Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to Demand Iran Deadline on Inspections (But He Promised Not to Be Mean to Iran?)
Boston Globe ^ | September 27, 2009 | David E. Sanger and William J. Broad

Posted on 09/27/2009 1:45:05 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Response stiffens on nuclear sites

The Obama administration plans to tell Tehran this week that the nation has three months to open its numerous nuclear sites to inspection, turn over notebooks and computers, and answer detailed questions about its suspected efforts to build a nuclear weapon, according to US officials.

The demands, following the revelation Friday of a secret nuclear enrichment facility at a military base near the holy city of Qum, set the stage for the next chapter of a diplomatic drama that has shifted the West’s posture and heightened tensions with Iran, even drawing rebukes from such allies as Russia.

So far, the administration has not laid out, in public, the extent of the demands it will put on the table on Thursday, when Iranian representatives are scheduled to meet in Europe with the Western powers. It will mark the first time in 30 years that the United States will join the talks as a full, direct participant, fulfilling President Obama’s campaign pledge for “full engagement’’ with Tehran.

But interviews over the past three days with administration and intelligence officials and international nuclear experts suggest near-unanimity that disclosure of the covert facility at an Iranian Revolutionary Guards base could be a turning point.

It is providing unprecedented leverage, they said, to demands for access to other sites that have long been off-limits, and for answers to hundreds of outstanding questions. The officials say that if Iran resisted, the United States would seek tough new sanctions, at a time when the government in Tehran has been weakened by internal strife.

The most urgent issue, current and former officials agree, is gaining immediate access, perhaps as soon as in the next few days, to the hidden tunnel complex that Iran now acknowledges is a uranium enrichment plant under construction.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iran; obama; preconditions
Obama campaigned that he wouldn't put preconditions on Iran.
1 posted on 09/27/2009 1:45:06 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Obama campaigned that he wouldn't put preconditions on Iran.

Progressives are always wrong. Its in their nature.

Anyone want to start a pool on when the Iranians set off their first nuclear device ?

2 posted on 09/27/2009 2:24:11 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

And if they don’t?

I don’t think the nutjobs in Tehran are worried a bit about Obama.


3 posted on 09/27/2009 3:12:16 AM PDT by Ronin (Nemo me impune lacesset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

I am wondering whether Zero is just going through the motions? He wants to appear concerned but in the end Israel will be destroyed with one Iranian nuke. Zero will have obtained his objective, destruction of Israel, and there will not be a trace of blood on HIM (the ONE).

I agree this is dark logic but we are dealing with an immoral individual (Zero that is).


4 posted on 09/27/2009 4:03:39 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bytesmith
...Israel will be destroyed with one Iranian nuke.

Perhaps so. Iran can then expect a rain of nuclear-armed missiles launched by Israeli subs and perhaps surface ships. I would not be surprised that the israelis keep a few nuke-missile-armed fighter planes (and bombers?) in the air 24/7.

5 posted on 09/27/2009 5:03:09 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Worse than we could have imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

It is not an accident that this second site is located in their second most religious city.


6 posted on 09/27/2009 5:08:04 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Is this deadline in addition to, or instead of, Obama’s September 15 deadline? We all see how effective that one was. Maybe he should threaten to hold his breath and turn blue, this time?
7 posted on 09/27/2009 5:10:21 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
It is not an accident that this second site is located in their second most religious city.

Interesting. Do the Iranithugs expect Israel to spare it on religious grounds?

8 posted on 09/27/2009 5:16:55 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Worse than we could have imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
If iran strikes Israel, Bibi will have no qualms about igniting Qom.

Bomb, bomb, Qom gone.

9 posted on 09/27/2009 6:05:50 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Thanks for the reminder (Mutually assured destruction). Maybe that will keep IAMANUTJOB in line. Surely Zero won’t.


10 posted on 09/27/2009 6:14:37 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bytesmith

It’s going to take a lot more than one Iranian nuke to destroy Israel. And you better believe they won’t go down alone.


11 posted on 09/27/2009 6:28:04 AM PDT by Ronin (Nemo me impune lacesset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The Obama administration plans to tell Tehran this week that the nation has three months

As of this past July (at the G-8) wasn't the clock originally supposed to have run out on Iran in late September (by the G-20)?

Granted the G-8 couldn't then agree on language promising immediate new sanctions, but they did promise to be very, very, very upset.

So, very, very, very upset means, "take another three months"?!

Why should we assume that Obama will be tired of carrying those goal posts for the mullahs by December?

12 posted on 09/27/2009 6:57:23 AM PDT by Stultis (Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; Democrats always opposed waterboarding as torture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson