Frum is a loser, and he always has been.
As for the rest of it, I happen to think that Beck is wrong that McCain would be worse than Obama.
But it’s not as if he is shilling for Obama. It’s not as if he thinks Obama is a good guy.
I think most of us here agree that McCain would be a really LOUSY president, and that he would be all the more damaging because he would wreck the Republican party even more than its current leaders have managed to do. Those of us who supported him and voted for him did so with few illusions, in the realization that we would have to drag him into the White House kicking and screaming and then fight him every day for the next four years. Because we knew Obama would be EVEN WORSE.
Obama is an agent from Hell. He is a Communist-Muslim-America-hater, determined to destroy our country and the entire West.
So, bad as McCain would have been, Obama is worse. So I think Beck was wrong to say that. Big deal. we can agree to disagree. And maybe he was just exaggerating to make a valid point—that McCain is really, really lousy. So, why waste time attacking Beck? How about focusing on the real problem, our country’s enemy, Obama?
I didn't see any difference beyond the designer label.
McCain is bright enough to foment an intention on his own ~ and his first order of business, as always, would be to crush the First Amendment.
Obama's people (his bosses) don't care one way or the other ~ they seek raw power.
Imputing motive to Obama is always going to be wrong ~ he's just not up to it.
Hey, AP, how about throwing America a bone and reporting on Obama’s origins, associates and background?
Look here: