Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: evandi
Why would it be better for an organization to be non-political and thus only care about what they can gain directly for themselves

You're under the mistaken impression that Bernanke and his buddies at the Fed get to keep the Fed's earnings every year.

How is it better for us not to know what they are doing

What aren't they telling you? When they change interest rates, they tell you. And then, they release the minutes of the meetings where they made those decisions. When they buy or sell bonds, they tell you. When they testify before Congress, you can see idiots asking Bernanke questions for hours. And sometimes, the questioners even know what they're asking, but not often.

and why so we have no possible way of knowing whether or not they are doing the right thing for the right reasons?

They tell you what they're doing and why. It's often years later before we know if it was the right thing.

151 posted on 09/26/2009 4:37:43 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

“You’re under the mistaken impression that Bernanke and his buddies at the Fed get to keep the Fed’s earnings every year.”

Nope.

“What aren’t they telling you? When they change interest rates, they tell you. And then, they release the minutes of the meetings where they made those decisions. When they buy or sell bonds, they tell you. When they testify before Congress, you can see idiots asking Bernanke questions for hours. And sometimes, the questioners even know what they’re asking, but not often.”

How many times do I have to list what cannot be checked? What exactly would they or you be opposed to an audit looking into if they could look into nothing more than they already do?

They don’t have to reveal their monetary policy or open market operations. They don’t have to reveal information about deals with international organizations or foreign governments.

“They tell you what they’re doing and why. It’s often years later before we know if it was the right thing.”

No, they do not. They do not have to, as things are currently. They cite privilege whenever they are asked something they don’t want to respond to.

Why don’t you not oppose an expanded audit since you are under the mistaken belief that it will lead to no more information? What could possibly happen if nothing more is looked into as you seem to claim?


152 posted on 09/26/2009 5:32:54 PM PDT by evandi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson