Plus if he had life insurance, I bet she would have already murdered him (”let him go”).
That’s not very nice. I have 1mm in term life insurance with the explicit instructions that I am NOT to be kept alive by means of some machine. My wife is to take that money and pay off the house and put our 3 girls through college. She has the same instructions for me to follow as well.
He is NOT being kept alive by “some machine”. He is being kept alive simply by being fed, maybe via feeding tube that works with gravity, maybe through tpn, I don’t know. But my point is if the wife has to starve him to death for him to die, then it is not “letting him go”.
She doesn’t want his medical bills taking her cushy home, so she wants the taxpayers of America to take care of those bills. It does seem to be about money!
Your wife’s boyfriend must be pleased with that arrangement.