Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge will rule by noon on GOP appeal to block Senate pick (MA US Senate)
/www.bostonherald.com ^ | Friday, September 25, 2009 | Laura Crimaldi

Posted on 09/25/2009 7:22:49 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA

A Suffolk Superior Court judge will decide by noon on a Republican Party appeal for an emergency injunction to block the appointment of Kennedy family confidant Paul G. Kirk Jr. as interim U.S. senator.

The state GOP contends Gov. Deval Patrick overstepped his authority by attaching an emergency preamble to the Senate vacancy law signed yesterday so the legislation would be enacted immediately. The usual waiting period for enactment is 90 days.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: communist; corruption; devalpatrick; gop; kennedy; paulkirk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Any bets on how this judge rules?
1 posted on 09/25/2009 7:22:50 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

There is still a GOP in Masshole?


2 posted on 09/25/2009 7:24:16 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

I have a pretty good idea.....


3 posted on 09/25/2009 7:24:42 AM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

I bet he rules that it was ok for the Democrats to shove this appointment through.

And the judge will say that it’s okay to declare an emergency if a Senate seat is vacant. And he will say that it doesn’t change the existing law, because they are still going to have the special election to fill Kennedy’s senate seat.

I think we have the legal “reasoning” in mind already.


4 posted on 09/25/2009 7:25:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

any bets on how the judge rules REGARDLESS of what the Mass Constitution says!!!


5 posted on 09/25/2009 7:25:55 AM PDT by Muzzle_em (BO STINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; nutmeg; raccoonradio

PING


6 posted on 09/25/2009 7:27:29 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Who paid for Mary Jo Kopechne's funeral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“It is of supreme importance that the people of this great Commonwealth have representation before the United States Senate....yadda yadda”


7 posted on 09/25/2009 7:28:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Claims that Mitt Romney “used the move” — which means just what? Did Mitt seat an interim Congressman this way?


8 posted on 09/25/2009 7:29:11 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
His INFO page is blank. No clues about him. ------------
The Massachusetts Court System
SEARCH
The Massachusetts Court System
Images of Massachusetts Courthouses
About Us
Welcome
Introduction
Administrative Offices of the Trial Court Departments
Judges
Courts
Resources
Self Help Center
Site Index
Contact Us
Home
Home > About Us > Judges

Honorable Thomas E. Connolly


Title Associate Justice
   
Office Mailing Address  
   
Secretary/Clerk
Telephone Number
 
   
Date of Birth/Place of Birth
   
Year of Appointment/Governor  
   
Prior Judicial Offices (Dates):
   
Prior Public Service
   
Prior Professional Employment
   
Education
   
Civic Activities
   
Professional Organization
Memberships
   
Publications
   
Judicial Branch Committees
and Activities
   
Hobbies/Interests
   
Practice Pointers for Lawyers Appearing Before You

 


 

 

Administrative Office of the Trial Court Web Site Disclaimer
Copyright© 2002 Administrative Office of the Trial Court
 
Comments, Questions or Suggestions? Email the Webmaster

Last Updated on February 19, 2003 12:05 PM

9 posted on 09/25/2009 7:32:11 AM PDT by elizabethgrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

I’m holding my breath, turning blue, blue, blue bluer...

At least the GOP is trying to hold them to their own laws.


10 posted on 09/25/2009 7:32:32 AM PDT by Reagan69 (The only thing SHOVEL-READY since BO's stimulus has been MICHAEL JACKSON (tammy bruce))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
I didn´t knowthe Mass GOP had any balls! ExPostfacto is well established, even if a Mass-hole judge rules against the GOP it should be easily appealed and a victory for our side looks good.
11 posted on 09/25/2009 7:34:57 AM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

He will rule for satan and the evilcrats... bank on it.

LLS


12 posted on 09/25/2009 7:35:30 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

He will deny the GOP hands-down.


13 posted on 09/25/2009 7:36:26 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Funny it wasn’t an emergency when he was sick and incapable of showing up for work. Same goes for Byrd.


14 posted on 09/25/2009 7:37:23 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

It is good to see GOP starting to push back.


15 posted on 09/25/2009 7:39:27 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Hope the GOP lawyers are all ready prepared with an appeal!
16 posted on 09/25/2009 7:42:19 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
I think the question centers on whether or not Paul G. Kirk is gay ~ Deval only works closely with gays, so it's a lock that the question is before the court.

Now, if the judge is an old fashioned type Massachusetts judge into graft, corruption and parking lot payoffs he's not gonna' like the gay part.

If the guy is not gay, the judge is going to suspect a whopping big payoff to Deval ~ which is a whole 'nuther thing.

May be some fish to fry in there today.

17 posted on 09/25/2009 7:46:14 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
NOON? WHO the hell are they trying to kid?? Pieholes!
18 posted on 09/25/2009 7:46:30 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Why did the GOP wait until this was a done deal? Why didn’t they try to stop them right from the start?


19 posted on 09/25/2009 7:46:32 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

You would have to be really stupid if you think this judge will rule with the Republicans. I am sure the judge is a Democrat.


20 posted on 09/25/2009 7:47:31 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson