Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Thanks for the ping.

If I'm reading this correctly the investigative reporters can't be sued because they did not actually splice into any wires.

5 posted on 09/24/2009 4:24:26 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights; xzins; blue-duncan; Forest Keeper; Kolokotronis
If I'm reading this correctly the investigative reporters can't be sued because they did not actually splice into any wires.

What he is saying is that they can't be sued (or prosecuted) because the ACORN employees were taking notes and writing stuff down during the conversation and by taking notes they were themselves "recording" the conversation. Handwritten notes would be considered an interception of a conversation in accordance with the definitions in the MD Code. A pencil or a pen would be considered "mechanical, or other device" under the statute.

On top of that the conversation was not "private" because the door was open and other people were within earshot (such as the children making noise in the background).

6 posted on 09/24/2009 4:34:26 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson