Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio
did not have the constitutional authority to do that.

They are talking about MA law here...

How about US Law, as in the US Constitution?

Article 1, section 9: "NO State Shall... pass ANY ex-post facto law"

Unless of course, MA is an exception to "NO STATE" and the state succession law, already triggered by the swimmer's death, is an exception to "ANY... law".

12 posted on 09/24/2009 11:22:02 AM PDT by C210N (A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

” the state succession law, already triggered by the swimmer’s death, “

Hmmmmm....

Wonder if ‘Bush v. Gore’ which held, in part, that (paraphrasing) ya can’t change the rules in the middle of an election count, would apply as a precedent...

Any lawyers out there???


16 posted on 09/24/2009 11:25:43 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Article 1, Section 9 is a section limiting the powers of Congress, not the states. It actually does not read as you say it does. It reads, more precisely, “No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.” Now, if you feel this applies to the states, that’s something different. But the Constitution most certainly does not contain the explicit directive you suggest.

Just sayin’.


66 posted on 09/24/2009 1:41:39 PM PDT by thetusknet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson