Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic; betty boop
The standard seems to be that if a theory can be misunderstood by anyone to address things it does not, it is allowable to consider that the fault of the author, and perceived faults of the author can be held to be admissible as faults of the theory.

Whoa. Who ever made the underlined claim?

756 posted on 10/13/2009 8:45:54 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Whoa. Who ever made the underlined claim?

It seemed implicit in the assertion that in a discussion of TToE, Darwin's character, political views, choice of friends and associates and their character and political views, etc. are relevant to that discussion.

758 posted on 10/14/2009 3:56:46 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson