[tacticalogic]

By "disciple" in the Darwinian case I mean a person who sees in Darwin's theory more than it claims to hold.

Then we've got people pointlessly "filling in the blanks" with stuff that isn't really there but that they would agree with if it was.

Then we've got other people who are rationally and logically "filling in the blanks" with stuff that isn't really there, but that they would disagree with if it was.

[betty boop]

The only answer is to make biology more rigorous — i.e., more like physics. Otherwise it risks becoming an exercise in “myth-making.”