Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
When the investigation purports to be about "origins of species" but excludes the first species, the common ancestor - then it should say so otherwise people will "fill in the blanks" for themselves. "

Sorry, I'm not buying the idea that arguments based on misperceptions are valid. Saying that Darwin should have explicilty said so just rationalizes hanging on to the misperceptions.

704 posted on 10/12/2009 4:01:39 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
My point is to explain why the "filling in of the blanks" has happened for the past hundred years and how Darwin could have avoided the mess his omission caused.


711 posted on 10/12/2009 9:18:49 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson