Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Why would it need to to that? The alternative would be that life does not exist, in which case neither the author nor the reader would exist.

LOLOL! If that were true there would be no theories of abiogenesis.

697 posted on 10/12/2009 11:57:08 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
LOLOL! If that were true there would be no theories of abiogenesis.

Indeed. What would be the point in requiring that a biological investigation first begin by declaring that "life exists"?

700 posted on 10/12/2009 12:05:19 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson