Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
It would be an exercise in futility to state everything a theory does not address.

The example I gave should have been stated in the positive, i.e. this theory takes life as an axiom.

694 posted on 10/12/2009 11:15:13 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
The example I gave should have been stated in the positive, i.e. this theory takes life as an axiom.

Why would it need to to that? The alternative would be that life does not exist, in which case neither the author nor the reader would exist.

695 posted on 10/12/2009 11:28:10 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson