[betty boop]

The question was "how". It was answered with only references to "what" and "where". Why is that?

Because if you want to know the "how" of things, you first have to understand the "why" of things.

"Why?" is not a scientific question (these days).

And so, since I cannot clear up this conundrum for you, you have to go see for yourself.

At least, that is my understanding of the matter. FWIW

[tacticalogic]

Because if you want to know the "how" of things, you first have to understand the "why" of things.

"How" is methodology. This discussion started when I asked for a formal declaration of acceptable methodology. Are you submitting that's it - 'First you have to understand "why".'?

What are the metrics for proper understanding of "why"?