[tacticalogic]

You MUST so manipulate hte word of God in order to beleive macoreovlution andthe bible aren’t in confl;ict- this is a fact- this isn’t a psurious statement.

That's your opinion, based on a your personal belief in the a doctrine of literal interpreation and inerrancy. That's a theological disagreement that's been going on for centuries. On what basis do you submit that it should be considered an object of political activism?

[CottShop]

[[That’s your opinion,]]

No sir- that isn’t opinion- that is flat out fact-

[[That’s a theological disagreement that’s been going on for centuries.]]

There’s no debate- God’s word is God’s word- If you don’t feel it is, then fine- just don’t expect Christians to beleive uyou when you say you are a Christian, or that you ‘beleive the bible’=- if that’s your position- There’s no ‘theological differences’ when it comes to God saying something, and someone not beleiving Him- that’s just flat out denial- not a simple ‘difference of opinion’ for crying out loud.