Replies

Yep- ‘oh Ye of little faith’- Dontchaknow it’s unscientific to disbeleive in the creative, miracle workign power of nature? Dontchaknow that faith in unguided , biologically, chemically, and naturally impossible evolution is perfectly combatible with hte bible? Stop questioning whether nature is capable of producing miracles that violate nature, and put your faith in evolution, because everyone knows that blind faith is what drives evolution, and that blind unquestioning faith in natural miracles is perfectly compatible with God’s word- Stop questioning the fact that God specifically said He created man and woman, and that He breathed life into their nostrils- Stop questioning the fact that the bible says there was NO spirit death BEFORE the fall of man- Stop questionign the fact that God looked aroudn the garden for a mate for Eve- found none that were compatible, and thus had to create one in His image for Adam- Yes- Stop quesitonign the scientific viability of Macroevolution, and just take it wholly on faith- don’t ever question whether nature is capable of creation- just accept it- to do otherwise is ‘unscientific’ by golly

Woopsie- Science itself REFUTES the hypothesis of evolution- but meh- just ignore all that and put your undying devoted blind faith to work and beleive- Yes people- Beleive nature violates it’s own principles, beleive that nature created life from dirty chemicals- Beleive Beleive Beleive! Never question!

God apaprently LIED to us when He said Physical, spiritual death and sin came into being AFTER the fall of man- apparently we’re to ignore these facts because ‘God was only ‘Joshing us’ when HE described the historical events of Genesis. (Oh, that’s right- the theistic evolutionists don’t beleive God’s word is God’s word, they simply think it’s man’s written testimony of ‘good writings and sayings handed down through the ages’- Yep- there’s no conflict with God’s word AS LONG AS you are comfortable DENYING God’s word is God’s word!)

“As some degree of apeman, Adam was going to die, so what was the use of God’s warning to Adam, ‘In the day you eat of it, dying you will die’? (literal translation). Did God give Adam the ability to live for ever and then after Adam’s sin take it away?”

Lol- musta been one heck of a crowded world IF species lived forever for billions of years while they evovled and avoided physical death

“In Scripture we read ‘for since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead, for as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive’ (1 Corinthians 15:22, 23). If Adam was the end of the evolutionary line, then thousands of evolving men had already died, and death did not come by Adam. Chapter 15 also tells of the second Adam, who was Christ. If the first Adam ‘ex–apeman’ was as real a person as the second Adam, then there came a day when God must have said: ‘You are of this moment man, Adam!’”

Again- Apaprently God LIED to us by saying Death came into hte world THROUGH ONE MAN- Yep- By golly, there’s no conflict whatsoever with evolution and God’s word- oh Ye of little faith!

“Suddenly, everything was different. Now he is sinless and can sin, but as an ‘apeman’ or part ‘ape-like creature’ he couldn’t have sinned. Now he couldn’t take the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, or he would be sinning, and would die. A moment ago there were no restrictions; now there are. For years he had gone without clothes, and of course he would not have been ashamed. But now he is a man. When did he lose his ape hair? A moment ago he had mates, now he has none!

If we make some allowances and jump these hurdles, the women of that day would present a problem. Let us set the stage again. If the theistic evolutionist believes Adam to be descended from ape-like creatures, but a creation of God, then what about the woman Eve? If Adam was a theistic evolution ‘creation’—a literal, though stretched, interpretation of the Genesis account—then what about Eve? God Himself said, ‘It is not good for man to be alone’.

What an incredible situation: Adam’s mother and father, sissy and brothers, aunts and uncles, cousins, nephews and nieces, and his grandparents, perhaps, were all around him, and he was lonely! Maybe God left them out of Eden, or was this first man ‘called out’ even as Abraham was in Genesis chapter 12?

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v11/i2/evolution.asp

Fot htose claiming there is no conflict between God’s word and the hypothesis Macroevolution- this is an assinine statement to make, and one htat shows a ignroance of God’s word for the sake of meshing two diamtetrically opposed viewpoints- I’m not sure what ‘bible’ you folks who claim this are reading- but it certainly isn’t hte actual word of God that you’re reading!

“God brought all the animals before Adam, and the Bible recounts that there was not found among the animals a suitable mate or helper for Adam. Did all the animals not include his mother and father, sisters and brothers, aunts and uncles, cousins, nephews and nieces, and his grandparents? Did God only bring a couple of every kind of animal and did he leave Adam’s relatives out? Why couldn’t he marry one of them? What was wrong with one of his distant relatives, or the closer ones?

Even if, amazingly, only one family had become the proto-man type, surely there must have been others near enough, well up in the evolutionary tree. Surely if the line-up of eligible spinsters included his unmarried female relatives, Adam would have said, ‘This one will do!’. And God would have said, ‘No Adam. you can’t marry that sort, you are a new sort of creature, you are a new creation. Or rather a new evolution … She is not your sort!’

So, some allow that God evolved man, yet at a definite point declared: ‘Ape, you are now man! Adam is your name!’ And at that point, God invested him with God-likeness and the opportunity to live for ever as well. But, did he omit to evolve Eve? Is this why he had to create Eve? The Bible is very explicit as to how God made Eve. She was made from Adam’s side.”

Yep- all you need is blind faith (plus a WHOLE LOT of biblical manipluation, until the bible is no logner recognizable as God’s word) in order to beleive there’s no conflict between the bible and Evolution!