[xcamel]

Go figure..

[xcamel]

ping-a-ling

[dirtboy]

Via LGF

What a surprise. I see CJ still sees social conservatives as a major problem in this country.

Sorry - although I disagree with the Young Earthers for scientific reasons, I do not see them as a problem. I'm far more concerned about directing fire leftwards, towards the real source of most of the problems in this country.

[DManA]

You can make an idol out of an ideology too.

[P-Marlowe]

So what’s your problem?

[Sam's Army]

Difference of opinion from Darwinism = trolling. LOL!

[steve-b]

Creationists Given Academic Credit for Trolling

So, when will GodGutsGuns finish his PhD and go away?

[humblegunner]

“provide at least 10 posts defending ID that you’ve made on “hostile” websites, the posts totalling 3,000 words, along with the URLs”

Wow, that would be easy!
You could just paste a bunch of drivel from some weak source an call it a day!

Hey, here’s one that should work.

http://www.icr.org/Evidence/

Tailor made for spamming & trolling if you ask me.

[PapaBear3625]

PhD candidate ping.

[FreedomProtector]

stupid title....engaging web sites with intellectual debate is not ‘trolling’

[Tribune7]

There is nothing wrong with Intelligent Design studies, criticizing conventional wisdom, or even having a faith that contemporary scientific theories will fail, which is really not much of a faith since the nature of science almost guarantees scientific theories to fail.

What should be clear is that it is far worse for science to adopt a dogma than a church. The strange non-science attacks at critics of evolution are a much greater threat to science than any fundamentalist could ever be.

With regard to the academy why is LGF more upset about courses at a private theological seminary than the propaganda taught at state-funded institutions?

[mnehring]

LOL. College work that requires you post to message boards?

[AmericanVictory]

Why is participating in debate “trolling?” Is honest debating, done out of conviction, “trolling?” Is the view that it is “trolling” snide elitism?

[tacticalogic]

Regardless of the suject matter, it seems ethically questionable for a college professor to author a theory, and then impose an academic requiremnt on students of his classes that they publicly defend and promogulate that theory.

[SeekAndFind]

provide at least 10 posts defending ID that you’ve made on “hostile” websites

What you call trolling, others would call DEBATING. You can learn a lot by posting your own arguments and reading the response of people who disagree with you. As long as you are respectful and present a logical, defensible case for what you belief, I see no reason why you should call that trolling.

The premise of the original post is that hostile websites are only for "friendly" posters (i.e., those who always agree with you). Why should that be ? That will be true only if the moderator says it should be so. If the forum ALLOWS dissenting opinions, that should not be considered trolling.

[Oztrich Boy]

A lot of professors give credit for students engaging in political activism.

[CharlesWayneCT]

You should properly cite the author of the blog post, not post his words and pretend someone else wrote them.

[big black dog]

(4) provide at least 10 posts defending ID that you’ve made on “hostile” websites, the posts totalling 3,000 words, along with the URLs (i.e., web links) to each post

The hostile sites are likely to delete the posts and you'd have no proof of your "work."

[Wacka]

So, What was GGG’s grade?

[ConservativeDude]

write a 1,500- to 2,000-word critical review of Francis Collins’s The Language of God — for instructions, see below”

I read this book...it’s junk

[tpanther]

LOL!

Trolling is what you closet liberals are doing on FR.

And thanks for proving that liberals simply can not tolerate dissent of their intelligence banning cult.

Not that we remotely needed more proof.

(My apologies to the sane folks if you were already pinged!)