Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Latest on Bombing or Talking to Iran
New York Times -The Opininator:A Gathering of Opinion From Around The Globe ^ | Eric Etheridge

Posted on 09/23/2009 12:41:59 AM PDT by lbryce

New York Times -The Opininator:A Gathering of Opinion From Around The Globe

The Latest on Bombing or Talking to Iran

Let’s start with the bombing. Ace at Ace of Spades HQ points to a Jerusalem Post story today in which a former Israeli official floats a conditional timeline for bombing Iran.

Israel will be compelled to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities if Western powers do not impose serious sanctions against Teheran by the end of 2009, former deputy defense minister Ephraim Sneh said on Wednesday.

He also points to a second Post story, a report on Nicholas Sarkozy’s comments earlier today on the true goal of Iran’s nuclear program. “It is a certainty to all of our secret services,” said the French President. “Iran is working today on a nuclear [weapons] program.”

Michael Ledeen excerpts those sentences and a few more from Sarkozy’s remarks, and swoons: “He really has his moments, doesn’t he? And he’s really got an intelligence service . . . sigh.”

Jeffrey Goldberg picks up another remark from an AFP story, which reported that Sarkozy “said he would not ’shake the hand of someone who wants to wipe Israel off the map’, referring to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”

Back to Goldberg:

In reading that last paragraph, I have to say that I felt some jealousy; I wish the American President would make a bit more clear his outrage at Iran’s desire to see Israel eliminawted. I don’t doubt that he finds it outrageous, but sometimes a little emotion would be useful.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airattack; iran; israel; mhmmdnsm09232009; nuclearweaponry
This is the New York Times we're talking about here so there's no way I'm going to get carried away, get caught off guard, ameliorating any the vehemence, hostility they very much well deserve. They've done a decent job of bringing in varied, disparate viewpoints, perspectives from across the political spectrum particularly in this case regarding Iranian nukes that makes for a comprehensive, thoughtful discussion of the issues, where we'll all better off for it.
1 posted on 09/23/2009 12:42:00 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

if Sarkozy had any stones he would work with Israel to make sure that the plane carrying the enemy leader did not reach home .


2 posted on 09/23/2009 2:08:19 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson