Brilliant.
That applies to almost everything I read. The art of writing has almost been lost.
I have firm rules on everything I *start* to read:
1. Basically ignore the title as it usually is just a sensationalized attempt to get you to read the article and has little to do with reality (especially when in ALL CAPS), like “THE DAY THE INTERNET DIED.”
2. If the first sentence doesn’t engage me, I’m done, especially in cases where nothing about the sensationalized title is explained.
3. If the first sentence test is passed I’ll read the first paragraph. If that doesn’t engage me, I’m done.
That takes care of about 97% of what catches my eye.
This article is a major FAIL on all accounts.
Nice editing approach. My own approach goes like this:
1. Title: Does the subject interest me?
if no, then done.
2. Title + author: Do I know as much as the author and do I agree with their position?
if yes, then done
3. Title: If I disagree with their position, start to read the article. If there are no new facts (usually determined within the first paragraph) then done.
4. Read remaining articles. Note new arguments and facts for and against my positions and learn. Adjust my positions as necessary.