Posted on 09/21/2009 7:03:17 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Leon Brozyna Says: September 21st, 2009 at 4:09 am
Dr. Taitz:
In perusing a number of web sites and commentary on the Rhodes case and the latest results, I find that the comments generally fall into two groups —
*** 1 - the judge is terrible and the ruling is an injustice.
*** 2 - the judge is correct in properly smacking down Orly.
I suggest that there is a third possibility that exists that no one seems to have publicly mentioned — that Judge Land is brilliant by handing down a deliberately inflammatory ruling bordering on judicial misconduct thereby inviting Rule 11 discovery.
Just think about it for a minute.
If Judge Land had granted the TRO, the case might have dragged on for months before getting to the discovery phase. On the other hand, the judge could have dispassionately denied the TRO by narrowly interpreting the law in favor of the defendants and Cpt Rhodes would have deployed to Iraq, making further motions moot.
By ruling as he did, as though he was having a judicial melt-down, it seems he has practically handed you an engraved invitation to submit a motion for Rule 11 discovery. Did he do this deliberately in the hope that you would take this route? We’ll never know. Even if this case blows up in Obama’s face, Judge Land’s thought processes may remain forever hidden (unless he has his memoirs published after he retires or dies). The point is that you now have, in this case, the best possibility to go for discovery - perhaps even better than in the case pending before Judge Carter. Craft your arguments carefully - Obama’s defense team may come to really hate Judge Land for his seeming melt-down.
Another thought - there was an earlier case in which the judge dismissed plaintiff’s motion and referred to blogs, the internet, twittering, etc. in his ruling. Made quite a splash when the ruling was handed down. I believe the case is still out on appeal - may have tried for rule 11 discovery based on judge’s conduct. Something else you may want to look into after you’ve responded to defendant’s motion before Judge Carter.
Everything seems to be coming together. The next few weeks may just turn out to be the most important in our Republic’s history. Our prayers are with you.
Leon Brozyna CW2, USA (Ret)
Also of note:
"Captain Connie Rhodes, Letter, Update, September 21, 2009, Letter prepared by acquaintance, Judge Land ruling, Rhodes deployment to Iraq
...
Mr. Frost stated that after speaking with his boss and the acquaintance assuring the Court an original would be sent after Capt. Rhodes arrives in Iraq, the court accepted the document."
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/captain-connie-rhodes-letter-update-september-21-2009-letter-prepared-by-acquaintance-judge-land-ruling-rhodes-deployment-to-iraq/#comments
And...
"Letter signed Capt. Connie Rhodes says she never OK'd appeal, says Rhodes will file complaint against attorney Orly Taitz
A letter filed Friday and signed Capt. Connie Rhodes, who filed a complaint Sept. 4 in U.S. District Court that sought to stop her deployment to Iraq by arguing that President Barack Obama can’t legitimately hold office, states that she never authorized her attorney to appeal a Wednesday ruling against her."
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_news/story/844811.html
Sorry, but there is not a chance of this blowing anything wide open. She is being threatened with sanctions not for filing the lawsuit challenging Obama's eligibility, but only for filing a baseless motion for reconsideration (in that the motion for reconsideration did not address the legal grounds in the judge's original opinion). So she is not going to be able to take discovery into anything having to do with Obama's eligibility. The only issue is whether her motion for reconsideration was legally proper.
-snip-
From link. "I asked “would that acquaintance would be a Mr. Joe Parton,” and Mr. Frost said he would not give “his” name, and that the Court has accepted the document as authentic. Mr. Frost also stated that “if the Court does not receive an original from Iraq then there may be a problem.“
-snip-
"I have received an email address for Capt. Rhodes and will send her an email asking if she signed the letter. Which we already know the signature was “cut & pasted” and it appears with the permission of the Clerks office?”"
- end snip -
Funny that she couldn't do it herself.
----------
To: cvq3842
The original order ruled the suit was frivolous becuase he tried to use the interpleader statute where it has no possible application. That has nothing to do with Obama's birth certificate. He will be sanctioned, and it will be upheld on appeal.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2208530/posts?page=33#33
----
You struck out about Hemenway being sanctioned with a fine. No fine no appeal. The Judge ate his balls.
Accusing the judge of malpractice (blue) and/or dishonesty, subverting justice, and conspiracy? (red)
Probably not the smartest thing a lawyer could do.
I didn't say Hemenway would be fined. I said he would be sanctioned. He was, with a reprimand. He could have appealed-- any sanction, whether or not it involves a monetary penalty, is appealable-- but Hemenway didn't.
~~PING!
So, I see the fact she herself did not
fax this letter has been allegedly
admitted, as a ‘friend’ sent it.
Still, the ID of the fax doc issue
and the Kinkos/Fedex/whoever could
NOT find any fax from their facility
at the time the fax indicated .. right ?
I figured you would wiggle your way. You know dang well what you meant at the time. I doubt Hemenway cares what this judge thinks.
I hope Judge Carter understands Marines are dying because of the Islamist’s rules of engagement in Afghnaistan.
******************************************************
Judge Carter understands , he has visited Afghanistan himself... he must also understand how dangerous Obama is in foreign affairs and such , if Obama continues to kick Israel , Poland and deny troops needed for victory in Afghanistan we could end up in a world of hurt. I’d say Obamas actions as CIC would lead most thinking people to question what team he’s on and isn’t that precisely why we have the NBC rule in the first place.
Judge Carter appears to have the depth of character which would do the right thing. If Barry is an NBC with no cloud upon his bonefides, you could expect Judge Carter to so rule without allowing what he may ‘feel’ about the CiC malfeasance to enter into his decision. THAT is the sort of character his military service instilled in him and which is so often missing in liberal minds. Compare Judge Carter’s methodology with Judge Clay Land’s nasty little outburst dealing with the same poorly educated lawyer. Carter respects the law, Land appears to be a ‘respecter of persons’ ... and IMHO as corrupt as any good ol’ boy cracker you’ll ever hope to never come before in a court of law.
Sorry, I didn't know he appealed. But my main point stands-- getting hit with Rule 11 sanctions doesn't entitle the sanctioned lawyer to discover Obama's birth records to fight the sanctions order.
Do you have a link to that? I’d like to check it out.
Placemark.
(as though I have nothing else to do but it’s hard to tear myself away today.)
Info thanks. I found the appeal.
And I always though PACER was totally a paid site.
Although, I’m finding Hollister case documents referring to Appeal # 09-5080 with Scibd looking them over...here’s one.
“If she does not start working with competent attroneys in this case and the Judge Carter case then she is a plant by you know who”
Good point. If she’s a plant, the cover will fade as the process continues.
It should be another interesting week in the Obama saga of who am I?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.