Yet Washington has pulled the Visas of the acting Honduran President although he acted in accordance with the Honduran Constitution, Article 239 which reads "No citizen who has already served as head of the executive branch can be president or vice president. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform, as well as those who support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in its functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years." The Honduran Legislature voted almost unanimously (except for the 8 members of the Honduran Communist Party, go figure) as well as their Supreme Court to remove President Manuel Zelaya IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR CONSTITUTION. Am I missing something here? We welcome Gaddafi and Ahmadinejad but refuse a representative that stood up for his country's law? Why is Obama and Clinton so upset about the actions of the Honduran Legislature?
To: John.Galt2012
Mohmar, Mahmud and Hussein... sounds more like the three stooges meeting.
2 posted on
09/21/2009 4:33:33 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: John.Galt2012
Why is Obama and Clinton so upset about the actions of the Honduran Legislature? Because they both have a visceral hatred of constitutional restraints.
3 posted on
09/21/2009 4:34:38 AM PDT by
tbpiper
To: John.Galt2012
Obama’s Amerika, including the SCOTUS, hates Constitutions,
and hates all Democracies, like England, France, Israel,
Poland. Instead, they only support terrorists like
in Iran, Venezuela, Libya, and NK.
Elections have consequences.
In this case, America has changed sides.
4 posted on
09/21/2009 4:37:19 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson