Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SE Mom

McChrystal says: “Failure to provide adequate resources also risks a longer conflict, greater casualties, higher overall costs, and ultimately, a critical loss of political support.”

0’s ‘justification’ yesterday was that he didn’t want to risk sending another military man/woman into harm’s way without a plan for victory. So he has no problem risking the lives of troops already there and the probability of total mission failure.


22 posted on 09/21/2009 5:10:22 AM PDT by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: drierice

So O doesn’t want to risk the lives of reinforcements, but the tens of thousands calling for support over there are just supposed to wait until wisdom falls down and hits this jackass TOTUS on the head?

Kind of a macrocosm of the 4 US marines who died this week in a withering taliban ambush, after calling and waiting over an hour for support- because of obama ROE restrictions


26 posted on 09/21/2009 5:22:43 AM PDT by silverleaf (If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson