Skip to comments.
Carrie Prejean Electrifies Conservative Base
Christian Post ^
| 9/19/2009
| Michelle Vu
Posted on 09/20/2009 7:20:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-136 next last
To: stickandrudder
Here ya go ... Eye wash
101
posted on
09/20/2009 10:02:31 PM PDT
by
webschooner
(First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -- Mahatma Gandhi)
To: Fractal Trader
I would argue that tatoos were forbidden based on what they were at that time, specifically they were markings to honor and worship false gods. The same goes for cutting oneself. In the account of Elijah taunting the prophets of baal - they danced around the alter and cut themselves (no fire came). If Deut 14:1 is universally applied it is a prohibition against all surgery. One could argue sin for a mistake whle cooking dinner (you can see that taking something too far becomes absurd). Also, even if "no tatoos" were simply a prohibition on marking one's body I do not think one can decide to extend that to implants without a lot more biblical information.
1 Cor 3:16 is supporting of 1 Cor 6:19-20. But neither of them do more that state we are to treat are bodies properly as a temple of the Holy Spirit that God has given to live in us through Christ. Without a clear mandate that a thing is wrong I contend that we have liberty as described by Paul.
102
posted on
09/20/2009 10:04:32 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Agree completely. But it offers no support at all to what you have contended. How exactly do you know that she doesn’t fear the Lord? Instead of accusing her of inappropriate actions perhaps you should be praising her. It is so according to this proverb as far as you know.
103
posted on
09/20/2009 10:07:57 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: Las Vegas Ron
It was intended to be humorous, as already stated elsewhere. It was mildly contentious, but no more contentious than disagreeing with you regarding your statements. That was how it was intended, and if you dont know that you should. (and no, dont even try to think you can support an argument re: contentiousness)
I still think this is all about your own self created moral box that you claim is scriptural. If it was disrespectful (and I do not think it was) it was not disrespectful to you unless you are God. So far your posts have suggested that you seem to think you have license to judge in His stead.
104
posted on
09/20/2009 10:18:00 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Ron, lets see, Carrie gives up her chance to win miss calif and possibly miss universe, all because she wants to stand up for her Christian belief’s. and you think that her âcharacter and values are negatedâ because of a boob job.....glad you were not a judge
To: Las Vegas Ron
You response that got yanked was not out of anger? If you cannot even be truthful with yourself I doubt I can trust very much of anything you say.
106
posted on
09/20/2009 10:20:25 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: 70times7
Agree completely. But it offers no support at all to what you have contended. How exactly do you know that she doesnt fear the Lord? I'm confused...how can you say you agree but contend that I offer no support?
If she fears the Lord, why does she offer her body in temptation? Cleopatra, Delilah comes to mind.
My original argument was that she should not hold up a certain value system when she violates the other tenants from the same book, it's an obvious hypocrisy and I cannot in good conscious get behind her.
107
posted on
09/20/2009 10:29:35 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: 70times7
You response that got yanked was not out of anger? I had a response that was yanked, where?
108
posted on
09/20/2009 10:31:56 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Why, would I engage in a conversation with someone who has no incling what so ever of what the Bible says regarding women tempting men with their body and not their heart and soul?You have no idea what I know or do not know about scripture.
As for what you know, It almost sounds as if you believe burkas would be a good idea. Then no men would be tempted by a womans body. I am really getting the impression that you are projecting your own guilt over unresolved lust. As christians the responsibility is ours to control our eyes and control our minds. We have the power of Christ through the Holy Spirit to do so, but it is easy to ignore that power and obey our flesh. None of that means we have a right to remove anothers freedom under God or the constitution in order to make self control easier.
Incidentally, I would be grateful if you would reference what scripture you are referring to in yet another of your "this is what scripture says" statements. So far in all of your posts I have seen one scripture reference, and it supported nothing you have stated.
109
posted on
09/20/2009 10:35:36 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: SeekAndFind
As a conservative, personally, I found her speech to be rather low voltage.
110
posted on
09/20/2009 10:36:23 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(It's time to make the earlier protests look like tea parties - the kind with tea & crumpets.)
To: Beamreach
Ron, lets see, Carrie gives up her chance to win miss calif and possibly miss universe, all because she wants to stand up for her Christian beliefs So, you support the 1st Amendment but not the 2nd and say you support the Constitution?
All or nothing, FRiend
111
posted on
09/20/2009 10:38:09 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: 70times7
As for what you know, It almost sounds as if you believe burkas would be a good idea
End of conversation.
112
posted on
09/20/2009 10:39:46 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: admin
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator As long as your at it, Comment #22 could stand some removing.
To: Las Vegas Ron
So you tell people to "start with Genesis" when they ask for a scripture reference but you are unable to click back a couple of pages to see where the mods yanked your post? BTW, no, it was not me. That post told nothing of me but a lot about you.
You claim to want discussion, and I had thought so, but I think now that I was wrong. You do not seem to want anything more than to be annoying.
No more pearls for you.
114
posted on
09/20/2009 10:44:12 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
To: 70times7; Admin Moderator
Well, I can't imagine what it was that posted that would have been yanked, I am asking the mod too.
I've stated that I'm not here to educate anyone, just gave you a reference to start with and have distanced myself from you with your women in burkas comment.
Have a good evening and good bye.
115
posted on
09/20/2009 10:53:43 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
To: Fractal Trader
good lord....breast augmentation has nothing to do with Christianity
116
posted on
09/20/2009 11:07:54 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
To: Talisker
excellent post as usual..I am becoming very fond of your point of view
..not in a gay way..lol
117
posted on
09/20/2009 11:08:58 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
To: Plutarch
really...talk about offensive posts..lol
118
posted on
09/20/2009 11:14:36 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
To: wardaddy
Thanks - As Mark Twain said, “A discriminating irreverence is the creator and protector of human liberty.”
119
posted on
09/20/2009 11:15:48 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Your Comment #69 was pulled. I responded to you in my post #75. I will not repeat what you said, but it was abusive and contained profanity. You now say you "can't imagine" what got yanked? You are either a liar or you need to change whatever meds or drugs of choice you are using.
Lastly, you need not state that you are not here to educate anyone. We know.
120
posted on
09/20/2009 11:45:03 PM PDT
by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson