Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; GodGunsGuts; metmom
So what? So God is not ‘within’ science, God is the originator of the physical world that the scientific methodology seeks to gain an understanding of. That is not a “so what?” that is the reason one cannot fit God “into the equation”.

What a silly thing to say! OF COURSE God is "within" science! As intricately as imanginable! He permeates all of His creation! He's omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient.

You can no more exclude Him from science or any component of His creation, than you can exclude derangement from liberalism!

Rational people see God within science all the time. From His handiwork to His design to His purpose. We may not understand it all the time, but when we do it's unmistakable. When we don't, there's obviously more for us to do.

It's not about some puzzle or some obscure hide and go seek game between God and science, and no one's trying to measure God via science, that's your ridiculous strawman. We rightly recognize science is His handiwork! If this idea is somehow offensive to you...oh well! No one gave you the keys or appointed you gatekeeper anyway.

I know you get hung up on your obsessions with people including God within science, and your run-away fantasies about automatic fire and brimstone sermons in biology if God is so much as mentioned in science class and so forth, but no one asserts that science can begin to understand Him or His creation, or that this is somehow the purpose of science. That's just more of your silly endless strawmen.

And quite frankly science has it's hands full with the likes of evolution, algore's hot air cult and various other liberal pseudo-science ideas anyway (like multiverse theory). Which aren't even about science as much as they are about liberal ideology; but the obvious energies people expend on determing the difference is exhausting, expensive and dangerous because liberals have no shame or scruples.

God is not measurable, nor can HE be compelled to act replicably.

No one asserted such and this measurable/replicable red herring was debunked too many times to count...just like "peer review". Multiverse theory isn't...study or prayer isn't...string theory isn't...but it's all "science" nonetheless...and there aren't any lawsuits I know of surrounding those ideas. But if you're going to keep demanding to be a hypocrite about "replicable and repeatable", be my guest!

And it occurs to me if God wanted to be "measurable" I'm sure He'd see to it, and even reveal that to us if He'd prefer. So just who are you anyway to presume so much with so little?

You put your supposed understanding of scripture above God and the Universe HE created.

If you run out if strawmen I guess it's time to project eh dreamer?

You refuse the evidence of God's physical universe in preference to worshiping your own supposed infallibility in interpretation of scripture.

You worship liberal materialism to the point of ignoring both the physical evidence all around you and scripture. You attack anyone's interpretation of scripture that threatens your myriad disconnections between Christianity and science. You misrepresent the Pope, you argue with failed strawmen and you're a walking talking projection.

697 posted on 09/25/2009 4:51:02 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies ]


To: tpanther
“evolution is a fact which enriches our understanding of life and being and such” Pope Benedict XVI

NEA liberal strawman projection tpathetic.

699 posted on 09/25/2009 5:11:17 PM PDT by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson