Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agenda 21, Secular Humanism, and the Animalization of Americans
Conservative Underground ^ | 15-Sep-2009 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 09/18/2009 9:22:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 701-702 next last
To: Borges

There’s a big difference between a person who is a non-Christian and a person who comes here to lie, insult people and make trouble while claiming to represent the truth. You are the former, OldSpice was the latter.


261 posted on 09/19/2009 9:35:39 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; metmom
Don't presume to try to tell me that I cannot be a Christian and accept the theory of evolution. Piety and devotion to our Lord Jesus the Christ is not based on a sliding scale with how wacky your cosmology is and how much you hate science and ascribe atheist belief to the mainstream position of Christian thought.

Wait...you claim to worship a God who referred to fictional characters as if they were real people, and expect to be taken seriously?

Really?

262 posted on 09/19/2009 9:44:30 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: metmom
EVERY scientific theory must be mechanistic and material; that does not in any way necessitate that science be “atheistic”, that is ridiculous, but shows where your animosity to the scientific method originates.

And do your cohorts who call the theory “evoloserism” also earn your approbation that they are acting like a 10 year old? No. You set yourself up as a scolding arbitrator of manners only when it is your own ox being gored.

As I said, Creationism retards ones intellectual and theological views, thus it is “cretarded”.

263 posted on 09/19/2009 9:45:15 PM PDT by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
You think dinosaurs walked around with people and you expect to be taken seriously?

You think scientific theories must subject themselves to your religious assumptions a priori, and you expect to be taken seriously in the scientific world?

Really?

Really?

264 posted on 09/19/2009 9:48:15 PM PDT by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Wow! What illuminating charts you have designed! Thank you oh so very much for sharing your insights, dearest sister in Christ!

I merely mention this, because Ayn Rand evidently detested Plato. As much as she loved his student Aristotle, she condemned possibly the greatest psychologist (i.e., someone who deals with the order of the personal self) of all time as a "socialist." (You just can't make this stuff up.) And then she got some kind of strange notion that Aristotle "turned on" his teacher — because HE was an honest man and proto-objectivist, while Plato was a mystical moron and professional cadger.

LOLOL!!!


265 posted on 09/19/2009 10:08:26 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Thank you so much for your encouragements, dearest sister in Christ!

Obama and friends seem to think the American people are totally stupid, weak, unprincipled, and selfish. When he finds out this is not the case, he probably won't consider it a "wake-up call" that he needs a course change. He'll probably just get angry — and nasty.

I can't wait for him to show his "true colors." I figure it's just a matter of time....

Indeed. I expect him to have a very public tantrum.

266 posted on 09/19/2009 10:11:26 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
I think it's reasonable to conclude that, for all his diverse genius and accomplishments, TJ had some "personal issues" of a moral nature. Of such kind that the Bible stood as a living rebuke to him in certain regards. This being the case, I can see how he'd be inclined to sneer at it.

Thank you for sharing your insights, dearest sister in Christ!

267 posted on 09/19/2009 10:20:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Yeah, a guy who published a version of the New Testament so people could learn Christ’s “pure principles”, a guy who attended church in the Capitol and gave money to Christian missionaries out of the U.S. Treasury...nope, no connection to Judeo-Christian tradition there...

Yes, he re-wrote the bible keeping the diamonds and tossing the rest to the dung-hill as he put it. He tossed out the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection and Jesus as the Son of God.

He described Jesus as an illegitimate child with no relationship to God.

268 posted on 09/19/2009 10:54:01 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
...nope, no connection to Judeo-Christian tradition there...

Here is TJ calling the trinity the "Abracadabra" of the priests.

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus."

269 posted on 09/19/2009 11:02:52 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

... the demoralizing dogmas of Calvin.

1. That there are three Gods.
2. That good works, or the love of our neighbor, is nothing.
3. That faith is every thing, and the more incomprehensible the proposition, the more merit the faith.
4. That reason in religion is of unlawful use.
5. That God, from the beginning, elected certain individuals to be saved, and certain others to be damned; and that no crimes of the former can damn them; no virtues of the latter save.”

Thomas Jefferson


270 posted on 09/19/2009 11:17:30 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; narses

Old Spice: Fat chance.


271 posted on 09/19/2009 11:23:16 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; narses
George Washington was an Episcopalian and was buried out of a Lutheran Church. Maybe he was not a Founding Father? If Washington was not a Founding Father, just who was?

John Adams was a Unitarian and not an atheist, simply not a Christian.

272 posted on 09/19/2009 11:32:21 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Raymann; betty boop

snip: As for the “law of Identity”, that’s pure Aristotelian thought. That horse has been beat too many times for me to explain that.

Spirited: The “law of identity’ is built on the metaphysical foundation of monism (paganism, naturalism), meaning that everything is ‘one with’ and/or an extension of nature or cosmos. By extension of this view, Aristotle very naturally believed that mankind is completely controlled by (fated, doomed,etc) unseen forces of nature.

In other words, man’s ‘identity’ has been written by the stars (planets, gods) long before man is born. Man, having no free will, is fated or doomed to be and to live according to what the ‘gods’ have written. Consequently, a few men were fated to be kings and the owners of everything while the many were fated to be subhumans who owned nothing and whose lives were spent as drudges in service to the kings.

Today’s neo-pagans call that last concept ‘social construction.’

Modernity’s neo-paganism takes two forms: positivist materialism-secular humanism and Cosmic Humanism. Note the language common to both: caused (by the gods) and determined (fated by the gods)and variations on that theme: genetically determined, triune brain, socially constructed.

‘Gayness’ is ‘fully caused’ by ‘genetics’ and heteronormativity is the neo-sin of believing gays are not caused and determined.

The blatant inner contradictions come into focus here in that the former (gays) supposedly lack free will, thus are innocent victims of ‘gene-gods’ (caused & determined) while the latter obviously do have free will in that their thoughts and male-femaleness are independant of ‘causation.’


273 posted on 09/20/2009 3:54:15 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish
Modernity’s neo-paganism takes two forms: positivist materialism-secular humanism and Cosmic Humanism. Note the language common to both: caused (by the gods) and determined (fated by the gods)and variations on that theme: genetically determined, triune brain, socially constructed.

Great observation... In other words, fantasy is their medium of infinitization...


‘Gayness’ is ‘fully caused’ by ‘genetics’ and heteronormativity is the neo-sin of believing gays are not caused and determined.

Even though it is a scientific fact that evolution is only possible with HETEROSEXUAL relationships.

Adherents to 'modernity’s neo-paganism' (as you call it) have a little trouble making that admission.

274 posted on 09/20/2009 4:19:13 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I think I mentioned that anti-Semitism was not tolerated here, either in that post or the one before it. But you are correct—although many conservative Christians are her, it is not our exclusive province. Judeo-Christian in morality and outlook might be a better way to characterize the site’s value system.

I was responding to a complaint by a FReeper who was being annoyed by an atheist who was likely a retread troll.


275 posted on 09/20/2009 4:50:21 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice

It says ENFORCED ATHEISM. And a FReeper complained that you were basically forcing it on him/her in an annoying way.


276 posted on 09/20/2009 4:51:40 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: narses

‘Thomas Jefferson was a Founding Father, not the FOREMOST of them except to Democrats’

Exactly


277 posted on 09/20/2009 5:53:23 AM PDT by aimee5291
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: narses

Oldspice does sound familiar...wonder who?

The Founding Fathers were not atheist...thats certainly true.

I don’t know why he won’t answer your questions...perhaps he can’t ...


278 posted on 09/20/2009 6:07:03 AM PDT by aimee5291
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice

“The prominent Founding Fathers shared her views.”

Funny, I live not far from teh New Windsor cantonment, and at said site George Washington himself ordered the construction of a chuurch.
And he officiated prayers there.
Atheist you say?
Would an atheist do that?


279 posted on 09/20/2009 6:22:16 AM PDT by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; OldSpice; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Rand thought that unalienable rights could be secured on some other basis than that which the Founding Fathers insisted upon. But she never really tells us what that basis is.

Because she could not...

Morality and all of those associated ideals are rooted entirely in the presupposition that some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior.

The very idea that human beings have individual rights not subject to the whims of an earthly monarch, but subject to the laws of Yahweh, is directly from Moses.

Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence...

"...to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them... that all men are created... Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world... with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence..."

280 posted on 09/20/2009 8:29:53 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 701-702 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson