Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

That is the way I understood it, “corporations” were legal people based on a clerk’s insertion.

That said, the idea that an Entity has no inherent right to expose it’s views is unsustainable, be that Entity “Joe” who flips burgers or Exxon, who deals in energy the idea of curtailing speech is heinous to the Constitution’s mandate of a free market place of ideas.


80 posted on 09/17/2009 3:00:15 PM PDT by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: padre35
That said, the idea that an Entity has no inherent right to expose it’s views is unsustainable,

Correct, it is inherent to free association. I'm all for dumping corporate "equal protection" though.

85 posted on 09/17/2009 3:06:21 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: surrender, fight, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson