Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
We are not defending "them" we are defending the West. They are on the eastern frontier of the west, hence it makes sense to put a missile shield there.

You wouldn't think you'd have to explain this kind of thing to a sentient being.

34 posted on 09/17/2009 7:40:46 AM PDT by Publius Maximus (God, please let 2010 and 2012 come quickly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Maximus

Well, the new configuration is designed to defend Europe, so you should be ok with it. I personally don’t see why Europe can’t defend itself. Why should we spend money we don’t have to defend them? Let em build their own shield.


49 posted on 09/17/2009 7:48:28 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Maximus
Instead, the new system his administration is developing would deploy smaller SM-3 missiles, at first aboard ships and later probably either in southern Europe or Turkey, according to those familiar with the plans said.

I was a Foreign Service Officer for 28 years. Later means probably a very long time from now, if ever. No matter how Obama tries to disguise it, this is a capitulation to the Russians.

59 posted on 09/17/2009 7:54:08 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson