Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

At first glance your deduction would be correct. However, the alternate system that the Administration has selected, is less capable for defending USA mainland against long-range missiles, while providing a local Euro-centric capability. Which is precisely the reason that the Russians opposed the previous concept and will likely be placated by this alternate system.


144 posted on 09/17/2009 4:58:17 PM PDT by Resolute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Resolute
Just reading Poland's reaction on drudge. I have tremendous sympathy for the Poles. I root for them. And yes, they've been our friend. It's possible that the system there would have been better for our own safety. That's my first concern/question. Much as I admire Poland, protecting them is not top of my agenda, especially considering we're broke.

Maybe I shouldn't say this, but don't the Russians have a point? What if they wanted to put missiles next door to us, say, in Cuba? Oh wait...

Don't misunderstand. I'm for a great national defense. But that means defending the USA. Not Europe, or Asia, or Australia. We'll help when we can, but first things first. But what do you think? Does Russia have a point that the US placing missiles in their backyard is not a good thing for Russia? Wouldn't we react the same way?

163 posted on 09/18/2009 6:43:14 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson