Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yale medical school doctor faces weapons counts (psychiatrist gets psychiatric evaluation)
The New Haven Register ^ | September 17, 2009 | William Kaempffer

Posted on 09/17/2009 4:54:46 AM PDT by Brugmansian

NEW HAVEN — A Yale School of Medicine psychiatry resident was himself recommended for psychiatric evaluation after he allegedly boasted that he liked to “hurt people,” flashed a gun and made unwanted sexual advances toward women at a State Street bar.

(Excerpt) Read more at nhregister.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: yale

1 posted on 09/17/2009 4:54:47 AM PDT by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

What a d*ckhead! Individuals who are serious and responsible CCW permit holders are all but invisible until the fit hits the shan.


2 posted on 09/17/2009 4:59:21 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (WWCJD? What would Casey Jones do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

It’s Connecticut and Yale....and his profession..a bad mix.


3 posted on 09/17/2009 5:05:38 AM PDT by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
he allegedly boasted that he liked to “hurt people,” flashed a gun and made unwanted sexual advances toward women at a State Street bar.
I don't see the problem here? He sounds like your typical shrink.

(maybe the REAL problem is that he isn't a cross-dressing homo)

4 posted on 09/17/2009 5:18:17 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
...and made unwanted sexual advances toward women at a State Street bar.

Gasp!

Lock him up!
5 posted on 09/17/2009 5:27:39 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

’ at a State Street bar.’

A case of beer muscles?


6 posted on 09/17/2009 5:31:01 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Is he in fact a CCW licensee?


7 posted on 09/17/2009 5:38:34 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I doubt it. Connecticut is a discretionary issue state and forbids ownership of “evil black guns.”. His mere possession outside of his home is probably a felony.


8 posted on 09/17/2009 5:50:08 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (WWCJD? What would Casey Jones do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"Is he in fact a CCW licensee?"

RTFA!!!

The doctor, Robert Remington, 31, is due in court today to enter a plea to charges of carrying a pistol without a permit, carrying a pistol while drunk, breach of peace and two felony counts of illegal possession of an assault rifle.

9 posted on 09/17/2009 7:07:48 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
With a last name of "Remington", it would be disappointing if he didn't carry a firearm with him at all times...

I really like this quote from the article's clueless author:

a receipt in his possession dated Aug. 29 for a 338 mm sniper rifle and accessories

Let's see... 338 mm is roughly 13.3 inches, so that would make it a 1330-caliber sniper rifle, wouldn't it? I suppose that the accessories for such a weapon would include a horse-trailer for schlepping the weapon and a magazine full of ammo... How about 338 caliber instead of mm... Even if the writer had no background using firearms (ya think?), he evidently was absent on the day when they taught the metric system at school (as was his editor, if they actually have such a thing at newspapers these days)...

10 posted on 09/17/2009 7:26:10 AM PDT by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
...338 mm is roughly 13.3 inches...

His sniper rifle being tested before delivery:


11 posted on 09/17/2009 7:28:35 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TChris

You nailed it. Those are 16” guns fitted with 13.3” sleeves (used for proofing the sniper rifle barrels before sale to the general public).


12 posted on 09/17/2009 7:42:27 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
You nailed it. Those are 16” guns fitted with 13.3” sleeves (used for proofing the sniper rifle barrels before sale to the general public).

Tangentially: Do you (or any other FReeper, for that matter) know why big Navy guns are loaded with that much powder? It seems like a lot is wasted on a big, impressive fireball. Does it actually add to the velocity of the projectile, or is as wasteful as it appears?

13 posted on 09/17/2009 7:46:05 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TChris

The HE round for a 16” weighs about 2200 pounds and is propelled at about 2700 feet per second (muzzle velocity). The AP round weighs in at about 2700 pounds and is propelled at about 3200 feet per second (muzzle velocity). That requires a lot of energy and only a lot of powder will do that. Bear in mind that the gases that exit the tube have already been used to impart velocity to the round. There is very little unburned propellant at that point. It is spectacular, but not wasteful. Remember that the designers want the tubes to last as long as possible, so putting in unneeded powder will rapidly shorten the lives of the tubes and the recoil mechanism.


14 posted on 09/17/2009 8:02:13 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Thanks for the explanation.


15 posted on 09/17/2009 8:08:09 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Navel gunfire is the most accurate there is, believe it or not.
16 posted on 09/17/2009 9:42:27 AM PDT by gunner03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gunner03
Navel gunfire is the most accurate there is, believe it or not.

I've never tried using my belly-button for aiming, but I'll take your word for it. ;-)

17 posted on 09/17/2009 9:47:15 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson