Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo

The burden of proof is always on the accuser.


25 posted on 09/16/2009 10:11:06 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

Exactly. An accuser with no EVIDENCE of wrongdoing on the part of the accused has no business being in court. As we’ve observed before, the seriousness of an allegation is not enough.

I don’t think the Obama is eligible either, but so long as there is no evidence thereof and no otherwise discernable legal harm has been done, we’re stuck with him.


196 posted on 09/16/2009 3:09:18 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Joe Wilson was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson